Cited by 409Resilience and Mental HealthCounseling, Therapy, and Family DynamicsFamily and Disability Support Research

Applying a Family Resilience Framework in Training, Practice, and Research: Mastering the Art of the Possible

Walsh, Froma·2016·Family Process

Abstract

With growing interest in systemic views of human resilience, this article updates and clarifies our understanding of the concept of resilience as involving multilevel dynamic processes over time. Family resilience refers to the functioning of the family system in dealing with adversity: Assessment and intervention focus on the family impact of stressful life challenges and the family processes that foster positive adaptation for the family unit and all members. The application of a family resilience framework is discussed and illustrated in clinical and community‐based training and practice. Use of the author's research‐informed map of core processes in family resilience is briefly noted, highlighting the recursive and synergistic influences of transactional processes within families and with their social environment. Given the inherently contextual nature of the construct of resilience, varied process elements may be more or less useful, depending on different adverse situations over time, with a major crisis; disruptive transitions; or chronic multistress conditions. This perspective is attuned to the diversity of family cultures and structures, their resources and constraints, socio‐cultural and developmental influences, and the viability of varied pathways in resilience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/famp.12260

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an individual-oriented society, it is a challenge to translate intrapsychic concepts and reveal them as relational processes.

    “However, in an individual-oriented society, it is a challenge to translate intrapsychic concepts and reveal them as relational processes, such as by conveying these phenomena in a relational language and developing validated assessments of these relational or biopsychosocial processes (e.g., from resilience in individuals to family resilience) (Walsh, 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walsh, F.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Walsh, Froma
Venue
Family Process
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-12
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
616-632
ISSN
  • 0014-7370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-5300
OpenAlex
W2567201875
Cited by
409
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
18.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Family Process (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
family resilience, resilience framework, family systems, adversity, family functioning, positive adaptation, family processes, transactional processes, social environment, family training, family intervention, family assessment, family culture
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Dangerous Behavior, Family, Family Relations, Group Processes, Humans, Psychological Theory, Psychology, Research, Stress, Psychological, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review