The dynamic blood–brain barrier
Abstract
With the endothelium as its central unit, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a complex multicellular structure separating the central nervous system (CNS) from the systemic circulation. Disruption of the BBB has now been implicated in a multitude of acute and chronic CNS disorders indicating the potentially devastating effects of BBB breakdown on brain function. However, the healthy BBB is not an impermeable wall, but rather a communication 'centre', responding to and passing signals between the CNS and blood. New studies are identifying BBB-specific transport pathways that tightly regulate the entry and exit of molecules to and from the brain. They are revealing a highly plastic barrier in which dynamic changes in BBB components like paracellular tight junction complexes can contribute to BBB maintenance. Here, we provide a succinct overview of the current state-of-play in BBB research and summarize novel findings into BBB regulation in homeostatic regulation of the brain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ischemic stroke exhibits extravasation of blood-borne cells, chemicals, and fluid into brain parenchyma across the impaired blood-brain barrier as a result of increased paracellular and transcellular permeability and endothelial degeneration.
“Comprising 85% of all strokes, ischemic stroke exhibits extravasation of blood-borne cells, chemicals, and fluid into brain parenchyma across the impaired BBB as a result of increased paracellular and transcellular permeability and endothelial degeneration (305).”
From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [305]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 116 · Cited by 616
- Authors
- Keaney, J., & Campbell, M.
- Affiliations
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Campbell, Matthew
- ORCID
- Campbell, Matthew
- Venue
- The FEBS Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-09-08
- Volume
- 282
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 4067-4079
- ISSN
- 1742-464X (ISSN-L)
- 1742-4658
- OpenAlex
- W2119810088
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 116
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 27
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- FEBS Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Science Foundation Ireland
- Bright Focus Foundation
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
- Keywords
- blood-brain barrier, endothelium, tight junctions, paracellular permeability, brain homeostasis, central nervous system disorders, barrier permeability, transport pathways
- MeSH terms
- Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Astrocytes, Basement Membrane, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Central Nervous System Diseases, Endothelium, Vascular, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Sleep, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Microglia, Tight Junctions, Pericytes, Stroke, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Symporters, Glucose Transporter Type 1, Transcytosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review