Cited by 0RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsProtein Structure and DynamicsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protein tandem repeats that produce frameshifts can generate new structural states and functions

Open access
Osmanli, Zarifa, Aldrian, Gudrun, Leclercq, Jeremy, Falgarone, Theo, Gómez Bergna, Santiago M., Prada Gori, Denis N., Oleinikov, Andrew V., Shahmuradov, Ilham, Kajava, Andrey V.·2026·The FEBS Journal

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The genetic code uses three‐nucleotide units to encode each amino acid in proteins. Insertions or deletions of nucleotides not divisible by three shift the reading frames, resulting in significantly different protein sequences. These events are disruptive but can also create variability important for evolution. Previous studies suggested that the genetic code and gene sequences evolve to minimize frameshift effects, maintaining similar physicochemical properties to their reference proteins. Here, we focused on tandem repeat sequences, known as frameshift hotspots. Using cutting‐edge bioinformatics tools, we compared reference and frameshifted protein sequences within tandem repeats across 50 prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteomes. We showed that, in contrast to the general tendency, frameshifts within these regions, especially with short repeats, lead to a significant increase in hydrophobicity and arginine content. Additionally, the frameshifts, particularly in short tandem repeats, rearrange transmembrane regions, potentially converting soluble proteins into membrane proteins and vice versa. Given their occurrence in rapidly evolving, essential proteins, such changes may promote rapid adaptability. Our large‐scale alphafold modeling suggested that frameshift events can generate novel structures and functions, enabling the synthesis of multiple protein variants within the same coding region. Overall, frameshifts cause more drastic changes in tandem repeat sequences compared to non‐repetitive sequences and therefore can be a primary cause of altered functions, cellular localization, and the development of various pathologies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/febs.70273

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Crick FH, 1958, On protein synthesis, Symp Soc Exp Biol, 12, 138
  2. Li Y, 2014, Transactivation of programmed ribosomal frameshifting by a viral protein, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 111, E2172
  3. 10.1101/gr.119974.110 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/nar/gku608 · DOI
  5. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006196 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.12.026 · DOI
  7. Atkins JF, 2016, Ribosomal frameshifting and transcriptional slippage: from genetic steganography and cryptography to adventitious use, Nucleic Acids Res, 44, 7007
  8. 10.1128/microbe.1.521.1 · DOI
  9. 10.1146/annurev-virology-012120-101548 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90214-7 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1146/annurev.genet.36.042602.094806 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/ng0997-79 · DOI
  13. Sehn JK, 2014, Insertions and Deletions (Indels)
  14. 10.1101/gr.5987307 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.biosystems.2019.04.012 · DOI
  16. 10.1186/s12864-022-08435-6 · DOI
  17. 10.1073/pnas.1911203117 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.08.009 · DOI
  19. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3136 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S1876-1623(10)79002-7 · DOI
  21. 10.1146/annurev.ge.24.120190.001201 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/genetics/146.3.769 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004081 · DOI
  24. 10.3390/genes13020190 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/bib/bbz007 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.jsb.2022.107840 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/bies.10324 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.imbio.2022.152321 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/nar/gky384 · DOI
  30. 10.3390/biom12111610 · DOI
  31. 10.1371/journal.pone.0070698 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.07.026 · DOI
  33. 10.1073/pnas.96.18.9989 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/13506129.2020.1835263 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.06.007 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.01.011 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112811 · DOI
  38. 10.1021/jf903039j · DOI
  39. 10.1128/mcb.10.6.2492-2502.1990 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.09.007 · DOI
  41. 10.1042/bj3580305 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/s41467-020-18224-y · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.10.054 · DOI
  44. 10.2174/1389203717666151201192348 · DOI
  45. 10.1126/science.1254917 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.010 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/brain/awac479 · DOI
  48. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01025 · DOI
  49. 10.3389/fnmol.2021.759729 · DOI
  50. Mensah MA, 2023, Aberrant phase separation and nucleolar dysfunction in rare genetic diseases, Nature, 614, 564
  51. 10.1186/s40364-022-00417-w · DOI
  52. 10.1093/nar/gkv1189 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 · DOI
  54. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp482 · DOI
  55. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth911 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/S0097-8485(96)80003-9 · DOI
  57. 10.18637/jss.v091.i01 · DOI
  58. 10.1186/1745-6150-7-12 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Osmanli, Z., Aldrian, G., Leclercq, J., Falgarone, T., Gómez Bergna, S. M., Prada Gori, D. N., Oleinikov, A. V., Shahmuradov, I., & Kajava, A. V.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • CRBM Université de Montpellier, CNRS France
  • Institute of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology (IBBM, UNLP‐CONICET), Faculty of Exact Sciences National University of La Plata Buenos Aires Argentina
  • Laboratory of Bioactive Compound Research and Development (LIDeB), Faculty of Exact Sciences National University of La Plata Buenos Aires Argentina
  • Florida Atlantic University (US)
  • Ministry of Science and Education Republic of Azerbaijan (AZ)
Corresponding author
Kajava, Andrey V.
Venue
The FEBS Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-09-24
Volume
293
Issue
3
Pages
842-858
ISSN
  • 1742-464X (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-4658
OpenAlex
W4414480949
Cited by
0
References
2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • FEBS Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • European Cooperation in Science and Technology (CA21160)
  • Azərbaycan Milli Elmlər Akademiyası
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
frameshift mutation, tandem repeats, microsatellite markers, protein structural evolution, protein function evolution, hydrophobicity, arginine content, protein variants, protein localization, essential proteins, genetic code
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Humans, Proteins, Frameshift Mutation, Evolution, Molecular, Computational Biology, Tandem Repeat Sequences, Proteome, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review