Cited by 68EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningStudent Assessment and Feedback

Teacher vs. Peer Oral Corrective Feedback in the German Language Classroom

Sippel, Lieselotte, Jackson, Carrie N.·2015·Foreign Language Annals

Abstract

This classroom study investigated the effects of oral teacher and peer corrective feedback on the acquisition of the German present perfect tense, including auxiliary verb selection (a rule‐based structure) and past participle formation (an item‐based structure). Intermediate learners of German were assigned to a teacher feedback condition, a peer feedback condition, or a control group. Learners in the teacher feedback group were corrected by their course instructor, while learners in the peer feedback group were trained to provide guidance to each other at the beginning of a two‐day instructional treatment. Results from both an immediate and delayed posttest showed that while both experimental groups significantly improved in grammatical accuracy with both auxiliary selection and the past participle, the largest improvement was seen among the learners in the peer feedback group. These findings suggest that peer corrective feedback heightens learners' awareness of linguistic forms and that learners who provide such feedback may benefit not only from receiving but also from providing it. The results further demonstrate that peer feedback can be effective with less‐proficient learners and with different types of grammatical structures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/flan.12164

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These studies have typically compared the formative effect of peer assessment with either teacher assessment or no assessment conditions.

    “These studies have typically compared the formative effect of peer assessment with either teacher assessment (e.g., Chaney and Ingraham 2009; Sippel and Jackson 2015; van Ginkel et al. 2017) or no assessment conditions (e.g., Kamp et al. 2014; L. Li and Steckelberg 2004; Schonrock-Adema et al. 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sippel, L., & Jackson, C. N.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Foreign Language Annals
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-11-24
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
688-705
ISSN
  • 0015-718X (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9720
OpenAlex
W2273023063
Cited by
68
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Foreign Language Annals (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
corrective feedback, peer feedback, teacher feedback, German as a foreign language, present perfect, grammatical accuracy, second language acquisition, intermediate learners, learner awareness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review