Cited by 3Second Language Learning and TeachingMultilingual Education and PolicyHigher Education Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Examining secondary–postsecondary articulation of Chinese language programs: A survey of US college placement procedures

Open access
Zhao, Ran, Coss, Matthew D., Ruan, Henry, Li, Bailu, Ma, Jing·2023·Foreign Language Annals

Abstract

This study reports the results of a national survey of the types and uses of assessments for matriculating secondary students into college Chinese language programs. In addition to providing an overview of college placement procedures obtained from 35 college Chinese programs, the survey also probed into the rationales behind the varied placement procedures across different colleges and universities, the range of commonly used standardized tests and related policies and perceptions, and the perceived effectiveness of such practices by 125 secondary and 74 postsecondary instructors. Our analysis identifies both practices that hinder high school students' smooth transition to college and practices that facilitate the transition and achieve optimal placement in postsecondary Chinese programs. Based on analyses of convergent and divergent practices and perspectives, we recommend a series of principles and strategies for more effective secondary‐postsecondary articulation of Chinese language programs in the United States.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/flan.12709

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Arnold N., 2007, From thought to section: Exploring beliefs and outcomes in the foreign language program, 112
  2. Bloom B., 1949, Developing a college placement test program, The Journal of General Education, 3, 210
  3. Graham T., 2009, Proceedings of the 23rd JLTANE and the 14th NECTJ Conference, 1
  4. Ke C., 2011, Chinese as a foreign language in the US, Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 39, 177
  5. Ke C., 2001, Report on the 2000 CLTA articulation project, Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 36, 25
  6. Lange D., 1988, Shaping the future of foreign language education: FLES, articulation, and proficiency, 11
  7. Li R., 2008, Foreign language program articulation: Current practice and future prospects, 111
  8. Li Y., 2014, CLTA 2012 survey of college‐level Chinese language programs in North America, Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 49, 1
  9. McGinnis S., 1999, Chinese language teachers association monograph series: Vol. III. Mapping the course of the Chinese language field, 151
  10. Murillo A., 2005, Language program articulation: Developing a theoretical foundation, 21
  11. Song J., 2008, Foreign language program articulation: Current practice and future prospects, 119
  12. Spring M. K., 2008, Foreign language program articulation: Current practice and future prospects, 105
  13. Wallinger L. M., 2007, Increasing foreign language proficiency through well‐articulated study, NECTFL Review, 59, 32
  14. Wei M.(2017).Chinese placement procedures at U.S. postsecondary institutions(Publication No. 1880215427) [Doctoral dissertation The George Washington University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  15. Wen X., 2011, Meiguo zhongxue jiaoxue mianlin de tiaozhan yu yingdui celue [Challenges and changes in teaching chinese as a second language in the USA], Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue, 4, 538
  16. Wen X., 2017, Meiguo hanyu guoji chuanbo: xuesheng, kecheng, jiaoshi [Chinese language development in the US: Students, curriculum, and teachers], Hanyu Guoji Chuanbo Yanjiu, 2017, 11
  17. Xu P., 2004, Penless Chinese language learning: A computer‐assisted approach, Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association, 40, 25
  18. Zhang P. N., 2021, Typing to replace handwriting: Effectiveness of the typing‐primary approach for L2 Chinese beginners, Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching, 12, 1

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, R., Coss, M. D., Ruan, H., Li, B., & Ma, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Modern and Classical Languages Department Loomis Chaffee School Windsor Connecticut USA
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Research and Development United Educators for Housing and Literacy (UEHL) San Francisco California USA
Corresponding author
Coss, Matthew D.
Venue
Foreign Language Annals
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-08-03
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
690-719
ISSN
  • 0015-718X (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9720
OpenAlex
W4385553353
Cited by
3
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Foreign Language Annals (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
standardized testing, transition to college, language proficiency assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review