Cited by 139Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Role of social cognition in post-traumatic stress disorder: a review and meta-analysis.

Open access
Stevens, Jennifer S., Jovanovic, Tanja·2019·Genes, Brain and Behavior

Abstract

Social functioning is a key component of recovery after a potentially traumatic experience, and the buffering role of the social support in trauma resilience and recovery has been very well documented. Factors contributing to resilience and recovery are notable because although most people will experience a traumatic event during their lifetimes, only 6% to 10% are diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The relationship between an individual and their social environment is determined both by the quality of the social environment itself, and by the individual's perception and understanding of information conveyed by the other people around them. However, little research has considered the contribution of these internal social cognitive processes to PTSD risk or resilience. The current review draws on the existing literature on social cognitive functioning in trauma exposure and PTSD, identifying key questions and themes for future research. We utilized a meta-analytic approach to assess the evidence for alterations in social cognition in PTSD, finding a consistent large deficit in social cognitive performance in PTSD groups relative to trauma-exposed and healthy controls. We then reviewed the literature on the interaction of genes and the social environment, supporting the hypothesis that social cognitive deficits are a preexisting risk factor for PTSD. Finally, we reviewed relevant neuroimaging findings, which suggest that alterations in social cognition affect the perception of threat cues in PTSD. Overall, research on social cognition and PTSD is still emerging, but existing findings suggest this is an important and understudied area for the understanding of PTSD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gbb.12518

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Impaired social cognitive processes among individuals with PTSD due to compromised interpretation of sensory signals may hinder an individual's ability to communicate with others and infer others' feeling states, leading to feelings of social isolation and insecure attachment relationships.

    “In addition, impaired social cognitive processes among individuals with PTSD due to compromised interpretation of sensory signals may hinder an individual’s ability to communicate with others and infer others’ feeling states, leading to feelings of social isolation and insecure attachment relationships (Sharp et al., 2012; Stevens and Jovanovic, 2019).”

    From How Processing of Sensory Information From the Internal and External Worlds Shape the Perception and Engagement With the World in the Aftermath of Trauma: Implications for PTSD (2021) · cites this paper as Stevens and Jovanovic, 2019

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 139

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. https://www.nature.com/articles/npp2015299#supplementary-information

Authors
Stevens, J. S., & Jovanovic, T.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia
Venue
Genes, Brain and Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-09
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
e12518-e12518
ISSN
  • 1601-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1601-1848
OpenAlex
W2891647822
Cited by
139
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 6
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes Brain & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  • National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities (HD085850)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH092576MH098212, MH100122MH111682)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, social cognition, social support, trauma resilience, PTSD risk factors, gene-environment interaction, threat perception, neuroimaging, social functioning, trauma exposure
MeSH terms
Brain, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Social Behavior, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Emotional Intelligence, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review