The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intercropping enhances soil carbon and nitrogen
Open accessAbstract
Intercropping, the simultaneous cultivation of multiple crop species in a single field, increases aboveground productivity due to species complementarity. We hypothesized that intercrops may have greater belowground productivity than sole crops, and sequester more soil carbon over time due to greater input of root litter. Here, we demonstrate a divergence in soil organic carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) content over 7 years in a field experiment that compared rotational strip intercrop systems and ordinary crop rotations. Soil organic C content in the top 20 cm was 4% ± 1% greater in intercrops than in sole crops, indicating a difference in C sequestration rate between intercrop and sole crop systems of 184 ± 86 kg C ha−1 yr−1. Soil organic N content in the top 20 cm was 11% ± 1% greater in intercrops than in sole crops, indicating a difference in N sequestration rate between intercrop and sole crop systems of 45 ± 10 kg N ha−1 yr−1. Total root biomass in intercrops was on average 23% greater than the average root biomass in sole crops, providing a possible mechanism for the observed divergence in soil C sequestration between sole crop and intercrop systems. A lowering of the soil δ15 N signature suggested that increased biological N fixation and/or reduced gaseous N losses contributed to the increases in soil N in intercrop rotations with faba bean. Increases in soil N in wheat/maize intercrop pointed to contributions from a broader suite of mechanisms for N retention, e.g., complementary N uptake strategies of the intercropped plant species. Our results indicate that soil C sequestration potential of strip intercropping is similar in magnitude to that of currently recommended management practises to conserve organic matter in soil. Intercropping can contribute to multiple agroecosystem services by increased yield, better soil quality and soil C sequestration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security
Lal, R. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1097396 · Cited by 8,376
EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., et al. (2005) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/04-0922 · Cited by 8,046
Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity
Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11148 · Cited by 7,457 · cited 3×
“Ecosystem functioning and ecosystem services are inextricably linked to biodiversity (Cardinale et al., 2012).”
BackgroundPartitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments
Loreau, M., & Hector, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35083573 · Cited by 3,528
The Influence of Functional Diversity and Composition on Ecosystem Processes
Tilman, D., Knops, J., Wedin, D., Reich, P., Ritchie, M., & Siemann, E. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5330.1300 · Cited by 3,199
Poorter, H., Niklas, K. J., Reich, P. B., Oleksyn, J., Poot, P., & Mommer, L. (2012) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x · Cited by 3,163
Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems.
Tilman, D., Wedin, D., & Knops, J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/379718a0 · Cited by 2,803
Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems
Ju, X.-T., Xing, G.-X., Chen, X.-P., Zhang, S.-L., Zhang, L.-J., Liu, X.-J., Cui, Z.-L., Yin, B., Christie, P., Zhu, Z.-L., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0813417106 · Cited by 2,599
Self-citationSoil Organic Carbon Sequestration Rates by Tillage and Crop Rotation: A Global Data Analysis
West, T. O., & Post, W. M. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1930 · Cited by 2,215 · cited 1×
“Agricultural management practises such as zero-tillage, cover crops and complex rotations with deeper roots can enhance the rate of C sequestration by 50 to 500 kg C ha 1 yr 1 (West & Post, 2002; Lal, 2004; McDaniel et al., 2014).”
BackgroundMethods of Studying Root Systems
Böhm, W. (1979) · Ecological Studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-67282-8 · Cited by 2,028
Cited by
Yu, Y., Stomph, T.-J., Makowski, D., & van der Werf, W. (2015) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2015.09.010 · Cited by 466
Self-citationGrain Legume Production and Use in European Agricultural Systems
Watson, C. A., Reckling, M., Preissel, S., Bachinger, J., Bergkvist, G., Kuhlman, T., Lindström, K., Nemecek, T., Topp, C. F. E., Vanhatalo, A., et al. (2017) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2017.03.003 · Cited by 328
Drakopoulos, D., Kägi, A., Six, J., Zorn, A., Wettstein, F. E., Bucheli, T. D., Forrer, H.-R., & Vogelgsang, S. (2021) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103198 · Cited by 35
Self-citationJohn, I., Snapp, S., Nord, A., Chimonyo, V., Gwenambira, C., & Chikowo, R. (2021) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2021.107585 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Cong, W., Hoffland, E., Li, L., Six, J., Sun, J., Bao, X., Zhang, F., & Van Der Werf, W.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10-23
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1715-1726
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2142790522
- Cited by
- 579
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 27.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intercropping enhances soil carbon and nitrogen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/gcb.12738
- The paper
- Cong, W., Hoffland, E., Li, L., Six, J., Sun, J., Bao, X., Zhang, F., & Van Der Werf, W. (2015). Intercropping enhances soil carbon and nitrogen. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12738
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.