The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The interaction between abiotic photodegradation and microbial decomposition under ultraviolet radiation
Abstract
Elevated ultraviolet ( UV ) radiation has been demonstrated to stimulate litter decomposition. Despite years of research, it is still not fully understood whether the acceleration in litter degradation is primarily attributed to abiotic photodegradation or the combined effects of abiotic photodegradation and microbial decomposition. In this study, we used meta‐analysis to synthesize photodegradation studies and compared the effects of UV radiation on litter decomposition between abiotic and biotic conditions. We also conducted a microcosm experiment to assess the effects of UV radiation on litter biodegradability and microbial activity. Overall, our meta‐analysis found that under abiotic photodegradation, UV radiation reduced the remaining litter mass by 1.44% (95% CI : 0.85% to 2.08%), did not affect the remaining lignin and increased the dissolved organic carbon ( DOC ) concentration by 14.01% (1.49–23.67%). Under combined abiotic photodegradation and microbial decomposition, UV radiation reduced the remaining litter mass and lignin by 1.60% (0.04–3.58%) and 16.07% (9.27–24.23%), respectively, but did not alter DOC concentration. UV radiation had no significant impact on soil microbial biomass carbon ( MBC ), but it reduced microbial respiration by 44.91% (2.26–78.62%) and altered the composition of the microbial community. In addition, UV radiation reduced nitrogen (N) immobilization by 19.44% (4.77–37.92%). Our microcosm experiment further indicated that DOC concentration and the amount of respired C in UV ‐treated litter increased with UV exposure time, suggesting that longer UV exposure resulted in greater biodegradability. Overall, our study suggested that UV exposure could increase litter biodegradability by increasing the microbial accessibility of lignin, as well as the labile carbon supply to microbes. However, the remaining litter mass was not different between the abiotic and biotic conditions, most likely because the positive effect of UV radiation on litter biodegradability was offset by its negative effect on microbial activity. Our results also suggested that UV radiation could alter the N cycle during decomposition, primarily by inhibiting N immobilization.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies found that decomposition rates of roots, stems, and wood of the same species are positively correlated with those of leaf litter.
“Previous studies have found that the decomposition rates of roots, stems, and wood of the same species are positively correlated with those of leaf litter (46, 47)”
From Substrate and climate determine terrestrial litter decomposition (2025) · cites this paper as [47]
Citations
Cites
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1277:RTFMAO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1852:POICFA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tree.2011.02.003 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0909396107 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature05038 · DOI
- 10.1039/c0pp90035d · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01428.x · DOI
- 10.1029/2008JG000772 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10021-010-9353-2 · DOI
- 10.1029/2004RG000155 · DOI
- 10.1007/b97397 · DOI
- 10.1111/gcb.12113 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11258-006-9257-6 · DOI
- 10.1127/archiv-hydrobiol/152/2001/69 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00049-4 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-010-0342-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.12.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.025 · DOI
- 10.2307/3546223 · DOI
- 10.1029/2009JD012219 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0923-2508(03)00078-0 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10533-012-9737-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.03.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00084-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.10.037 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02579.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s10021-013-9712-x · DOI
- 10.1007/s00027-013-0296-5 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1159792 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1012965610170 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00667.x · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1134853 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01577.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01544.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02149.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01973.x · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0068858 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-540-68421-3_8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.agee.2005.09.013 · DOI
- 10.1038/nclimate2225 · DOI
- 10.1039/c0pp90037k · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Substrate and climate determine terrestrial litter decomposition
Wu, Q., Ni, X., Sun, X., Chen, Z., Hong, S., Berg, B., Zheng, M., Chen, J., Zhu, J., Ai, L., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2420664122 · Cited by 67
“Previous studies have found that the decomposition rates of roots, stems, and wood of the same species are positively correlated with those of leaf litter (46, 47), suggesting a parallel pattern in the global distribution of other litter types.”
Xing, P., Wang, Y., Lu, X., Li, H., Guo, J., Li, Y., & Li, F. Y. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172122 · Cited by 12
Liu, Y., Li, L., Wang, S., & Li, X. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1200155 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J., Liu, L., Wang, X., & Chen, Y.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Lingli
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-01-08
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2095-2104
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2148318211
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institute of Botany, CAS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Chinese National Key Development Program for Basic Research (2013CB956304, 2014CB954003)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (13263A1001)
- National 1000 Young Talents Program
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and biological studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Keywords
- ultraviolet radiation, litter decomposition, microbial decomposition, lignin, dissolved organic carbon, microbial respiration, soil microbial biomass carbon, microbial community composition, nitrogen immobilization, nitrogen cycling
- MeSH terms
- Models, Theoretical, Nitrogen, Photolysis, Ultraviolet Rays, Linear Models, Plant Leaves
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review