Biodiversity scenarios neglect future land‐use changes
Open accessAbstract
Efficient management of biodiversity requires a forward‐looking approach based on scenarios that explore biodiversity changes under future environmental conditions. A number of ecological models have been proposed over the last decades to develop these biodiversity scenarios. Novel modelling approaches with strong theoretical foundation now offer the possibility to integrate key ecological and evolutionary processes that shape species distribution and community structure. Although biodiversity is affected by multiple threats, most studies addressing the effects of future environmental changes on biodiversity focus on a single threat only. We examined the studies published during the last 25 years that developed scenarios to predict future biodiversity changes based on climate, land‐use and land‐cover change projections. We found that biodiversity scenarios mostly focus on the future impacts of climate change and largely neglect changes in land use and land cover. The emphasis on climate change impacts has increased over time and has now reached a maximum. Yet, the direct destruction and degradation of habitats through land‐use and land‐cover changes are among the most significant and immediate threats to biodiversity. We argue that the current state of integration between ecological and land system sciences is leading to biased estimation of actual risks and therefore constrains the implementation of forward‐looking policy responses to biodiversity decline. We suggest research directions at the crossroads between ecological and environmental sciences to face the challenge of developing interoperable and plausible projections of future environmental changes and to anticipate the full range of their potential impacts on biodiversity. An intergovernmental platform is needed to stimulate such collaborative research efforts and to emphasize the societal and political relevance of taking up this challenge.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Direct drivers of change that have predominated in the past 50 years will continue to play an important role, with climate change increasingly driving further biodiversity and ecosystem decline.
“Direct drivers of change that have predominated in the past 50 years (Fig. 3) will continue to play an important role ( 19 , 83 , 85 ), with climate change increasingly driving further biodiversity and ecosystem decline ( 19 , 83 , 86 ).”
From Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change (2019) · cites this paper as [85]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 104 · Cited by 303
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Nakicenovic N, Swart R). Cambridge University Press, Cambrige, UK.
- Settele J, Scholes R, Betts R et al. (2014) Terrestrial and inland water systems. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL), pp. 271-359. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
- Authors
- Titeux, N., Henle, K., Mihoub, J., Regos, A., Geijzendorffer, I. R., Cramer, W., Verburg, P. H., & Brotons, L.
- Affiliations
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie marine et continentale (IMBE) Aix Marseille Université CNRS IRD Avignon Université Bâtiment Villemin Technopôle Arbois‐Méditerranée, BP 80 13545 Aix‐en‐Provence Cedex 04 France
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Titeux, Nicolas
- ORCID
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-03-31
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2505-2515
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2302142942
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 7
- FWCI
- 25.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Global Change Biology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- HAL AMU (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Keywords
- biodiversity scenarios, land use change, land cover change, climate change impacts, biodiversity projections, habitat degradation, biodiversity loss, interdisciplinary research platform
- MeSH terms
- Forecasting, Models, Theoretical, Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Climate Change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review