The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A meta‐analysis of fertilizer‐induced soil NO and combined NO+N2O emissions
Abstract
Soils are among the important sources of atmospheric nitric oxide (NO) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O), acting as a critical role in atmospheric chemistry. Updated data derived from 114 peer‐reviewed publications with 520 field measurements were synthesized using meta‐analysis procedure to examine the N fertilizer‐induced soil NO and the combined NO+N 2 O emissions across global soils. Besides factors identified in earlier reviews, additional factors responsible for NO fluxes were fertilizer type, soil C/N ratio, crop residue incorporation, tillage, atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration, drought and biomass burning. When averaged across all measurements, soil NO‐N fluxes were estimated to be 4.06 kg ha−1 yr−1, with the greatest (9.75 kg ha−1 yr−1) in vegetable croplands and the lowest (0.11 kg ha−1 yr−1) in rice paddies. Soil NO emissions were more enhanced by synthetic N fertilizer (+38%), relative to organic (+20%) or mixed N (+18%) sources. Compared with synthetic N fertilizer alone, synthetic N fertilizer combined with nitrification inhibitors substantially reduced soil NO emissions by 81%. The global mean direct emission factors of N fertilizer for NO (EF NO) and combined NO+N 2 O (EFc) were estimated to be 1.16% and 2.58%, with 95% confidence intervals of 0.71–1.61% and 1.81–3.35%, respectively. Forests had the greatest EF NO (2.39%). Within the croplands, the EF NO (1.71%) and EFc (4.13%) were the greatest in vegetable cropping fields. Among different chemical N fertilizer varieties, ammonium nitrate had the greatest EF NO (2.93%) and EFc (5.97%). Some options such as organic instead of synthetic N fertilizer, decreasing N fertilizer input rate, nitrification inhibitor and low irrigation frequency could be adopted to mitigate soil NO emissions. More field measurements over multiyears are highly needed to minimize the estimate uncertainties and mitigate soil NO emissions, particularly in forests and vegetable croplands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crutzen, P. J., Mosier, A. R., Smith, K. A., & Winiwarter, W. (2007) · doi:10.5194/acpd-7-11191-2007 · Cited by 1,298
Testing a Conceptual Model of Soil Emissions of Nitrous and Nitric Oxides
DAVIDSON, E. A., KELLER, M., ERICKSON, H. E., VERCHOT, L. V., & VELDKAMP, E. (2000) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0667:tacmos]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 975
AKIYAMA, H., YAN, X., & YAGI, K. (2010) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02031.x · Cited by 746
Cited by
Xia, L., Lam, S. K., Yan, X., & Chen, D. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b06470 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, S., Lin, F., Wu, S., Ji, C., Sun, Y., Jin, Y., Li, S., Li, Z., & Zou, J.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-10-26
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2520-2532
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2507969335
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta‐analysis of fertilizer‐induced soil NO and combined NO+N2O emissions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/gcb.13485
- The paper
- Liu, S., Lin, F., Wu, S., Ji, C., Sun, Y., Jin, Y., Li, S., Li, Z., & Zou, J. (2017). A meta‐analysis of fertilizer‐induced soil NO and combined NO+N2O emissions. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13485
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.