The DOI matches its Crossref record; 157 of the 161 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conventional tillage decreases the abundance and biomass of earthworms and alters their community structure in a global meta‐analysis
Open accessAbstract
The adoption of less intensive soil cultivation practices is expected to increase earthworm populations and their contributions to ecosystem functioning. However, conflicting results have been reported on the effects of tillage intensity on earthworm populations, attributed in narrative reviews to site‐dependent differences in soil properties, climatic conditions and agronomic operations (e.g. fertilization, residue management and chemical crop protection). We present a quantitative review based on a global meta‐analysis, using paired observations from 165 publications performed over 65 years (1950–2016) across 40 countries on five continents, to elucidate this long‐standing unresolved issue. Results showed that disturbing the soil less (e.g. no‐tillage and conservation agriculture [CA]) significantly increased earthworm abundance (mean increase of 137% and 127%, respectively) and biomass (196% and 101%, respectively) compared to when the soil is inverted by conventional ploughing. Earthworm population responses were more pronounced when the soil had been under reduced tillage (RT) for a long time (>10 years), in warm temperate zones with fine‐textured soils, and in soils with higher clay contents (>35%) and low pH (<5.5). Furthermore, retaining organic harvest residues amplified this positive response to RT, whereas the use of the herbicide glyphosate did not significantly affect earthworm population responses to RT. Additional meta‐analyses confirmed that epigeic and, more importantly, the bigger‐sized anecic earthworms were the most sensitive ecological groups to conventional tillage. In particular, the deep burrower Lumbricus terrestris exhibited the strongest positive response to RT, increasing in abundance by 124% more than the overall mean of all 13 species analysed individually. The restoration of these two important ecological groups of earthworms and their burrowing, feeding and casting activities under various forms of RT will ensure the provision of ecosystem functions such as soil structure maintenance and nutrient cycling by “nature's plough.”
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is indicated by our results, where less intensive tillage, for example, reduced the disturbance of the earthworm environment28,29.”
From Farming practices to enhance biodiversity across biomes: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704
Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis
Guo, L. B., & Gifford, R. M. (2002) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1354-1013.2002.00486.x · Cited by 3,972
Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984) · Cited by 3,925
Jeffery, S., Verheijen, F. G. A., van der Velde, M., & Bastos, A. C. (2011) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.015 · Cited by 2,422
Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments
(2005) · doi:10.1002/0470870168 · Cited by 2,368
Biology and ecology of earthworms
Lavelle, P. (1997) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(97)88859-7 · Cited by 1,602
Herrmann, K. M., & Weaver, L. M. (1999) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.473 · Cited by 1,343
A comparative analysis of soil fauna populations and their role in decomposition processes
Petersen, H., & Luxton, M. (1982) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3544689 · Cited by 1,274
Earthworms: Their Ecology and relationships with soils and land use
Davis, B. N. K. (1986) · Environmental Pollution Series A Ecological and Biological · doi:10.1016/0143-1471(86)90050-4 · Cited by 1,158
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 161 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Bittman S., 2004, Advanced silage corn management
- Bogužas V., 2010, Soil physical properties and earthworms as affected by soil tillage systems, straw and green manure management. Žemdirbyst≐ –, Agriculture, 97, 3
- Bot A., 2005, The Importance of soil organic matter: Key to drought‐resistant soil and sustained food production (FAO Soils Bulletins 80)
- Fortune T. Kennedy T. Mitchell B. &Dunne B.(2003).Reduced cultivations – Agronomic and environmental aspects. Teagasc National Tillage Conference Proceedings Carlow Ireland 70–82.
- Henke W., 1994, Einfluß der Bodenbearbeitung aur die Lumbricidenpopulation und deren Aktivität in verschiedenen Ackerböden, Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut, 89, 89
- Jodaugien≐ D., 2005, The influence of ploughing and ploughless soil tillage on soil properties in winter wheat crop. Agronomijas Vestis – Latvian, Journal of Agronomy, 8, 200
- Jordan D., 1997, Earthworms in a Missouri claypan soil, 41
- László P.(2007).Adirektvetéses és a Bakhátas Vetési és Mũvelési Rendszer Hatása a Talaj Fizikai és Biológiai Állapotára. PhD Thesis Doktori értekezés Gödöllő Hungary. [In Hungarian]
- Mallet J. B., 1987, Changes in a Doveton clay loam after 12 years of direct drill maize production, South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 4, 188
- Meteorological Office, 1982, Tables of temperature, relative humidity, precipitation and sunshine for the world. Part III. Europe and the Azores
- Najar I. A., 2011, Earthworm communities of Kashmir Valley, India, Tropical Ecology, 52, 151
- Pekrun C., 2003, Okologischer Landbau der Zukunft. Beiträge zur 7. Wissenschafts‐tagung zum Ökologischen Landbau, 21
- Potthoff M.(1999).Synchronisation des Stoffkreislaufs durch Förderung bodenbiologischer Prozesse im Ackerbau. PhD Thesis Göttingen University Cuvillier Verlag Göttingen Germany ISBN 3‐89712‐666‐4.
- Potthoff M., 1998, Regenwurmgesellschaften in Ackerböden des integriert extensivierten Landbaus – Aspekte von Bodenschutz‐ und Wasserschutzmaβnahmen, Venhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie, 28, 545
- Rosenberg M. S., 1997, MetaWin: Statistical software for meta‐analysis with resampling tests. ver. 1.0
- Rosenberg M. S., 2000, MetaWin statistical software for meta‐analysis, version 2
- Satchell J. E., 1977, Soil biology, 259
- Severon T., 2012, The impact of conventional and reduced tillage on the Enchytraeidae population in sandy soil and their correlation with plant residue and earthworms, Landbauforschung, 357, 45
- Söchtig W.(1992).Wechselwirkungen zwischen der Lumbricidenfauna und unterschiedlicher mechanischer Bodenverdichtung einer Löß‐Parabraunerde in Freiland und Laboruntersuchungen. PhD Thesis Technical University Brunswick. [In German]
- Spagnollo E.(2004).Dinâmica da Matérica Orgânica em Agroecosistemas Submetidos a Queima e Manejo dos Resíduos Culturais. PhD thesis UFSM Santa Maria RS Brazil.
- Stancevičius A., 2003, Ilgamečio arimo ir beplügio žem≐s dirbimo įtaka dirvožemiui ir vasarinių miežių pas≐liui. Žemdirbyst≐ –, Agriculture, 3, 40
- Eichhorn H., 1990, Die Art der Bodenbearbeitung und ihre Folgen, Spiegel der Forschung, 1, 27
- Weber M., 2005, 8. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau: Ende der Nische, 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–375 of 375
Jansa, J., & Bukovská, P. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-0300-5_7 · Cited by 1
Rowe, A., & Crotty, F. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-64510-5_20 · Cited by 1
Aslam, M. T., Khan, İ., Chattha, M. U., Raza, A. A., Chattha, M. B., Ali, M., Hassan, M., & Fatima, I. (2025) · Agricultural sciences. · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1006600 · Cited by 1
Conservation Agriculture for Land Restoration and Food Security
Alekhya, G., Reddy, K. S., Saha, P., Das, T. K., Raj, R., & Babu, S. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-3392-0_4 · Cited by 1
Resilient and Dynamic Soil Biology
Williams, A., van der Bom, F. J. T., & Young, A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46409-7_15 · Cited by 2
Minarsih, S., Hanudin, E., & Nurudin, M. (2021) · Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity · doi:10.13057/biodiv/d220627 · Cited by 1
Impact of long term zero tillage on soil physical properties: A review
Phogat, M., Dahiya, R., Goyal, V., & Kumar, V. (2020) · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry · doi:10.22271/phyto.2020.v9.i5ao.12792 · Cited by 1
Mashavakure, N., Gutukunhuwa, B., Mashingaidze, A. B., & Gandiwa, E. (2022) · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science · doi:10.1080/09064710.2022.2052177 · Cited by 1
Moss, C., Lukáč, M., Harris, F., Outhwaite, C. L., Scheelbeek, P., Green, R., & Dangour, A. D. (2019) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15343.1 · Cited by 1
Efecto de sistemas de labranza en la población de lombrices de tierra en maíz forrajero
Aldaco-Gómez, D., Cadena-Zapata, M., Zermeño-González, A., López, J. A., & Chávez, E. C. (2023) · Ecosistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios · doi:10.19136/era.a10n1.3544 · Cited by 1
Earthworms: Essential ecosystem engineers providing vital ecosystem services
Briones, M. J. I. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-822974-3.00076-8 · Cited by 1
Self-citationCray, H. (2019) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo)
Earthworm communities in arable land : effects of crop residue management and field margins
Frazão, J. F. T. D. A. (2019) · doi:10.18174/474539
Hodson, M. E., Corstanje, R., Jones, D. T., Witton, J., Burton, V. J., Sloan, T., & Eggleton, P. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.10.26.355024
THE INFLUENCE OF PRE-PLANT TREATMENTS ON SILAGE MAIZE (Zea mays L.) YIELD IN NO-TILLAGE SYSTEM
Özyiğit, Y. (2022) · Turkish Journal Of Field Crops · doi:10.17557/tjfc.987034
Garré, S. (2022) · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2022-270-ac2
Garré, S. (2022) · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2022-270-ac1
Li, C., Zhao, Y. S., Cheng, K., Zhou, J., Xiao, X., Iqbal, A., Tang, H., & Huang, M. (2022) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy12092209
The post‐registration monitoring of glyphosate‐treated plants using anecic earthworms
Stroud, J. L., & Halsey, K. (2023) · Annals of Applied Biology · doi:10.1111/aab.12838
Torppa, K. A. (2023) · Acta universitatis agriculturae Sueciae · doi:10.54612/a.76s5t7nbtr
Ganault, P., Nahmani, J., Capowiez, Y., Fromin, N., Shihan, A., Bertrand, I., Buatois, B., & Milcu, A. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.07.28.550960
Landgebruik, P. A. M., Garré, S., Blanchy, G., Jarvis, N., Larsbo, M., Meurer, K. H. E., Lewan, E., O’Keeffe, S., Hassink, J., Verhagen, A., et al. (2022) · doi:10.18174/586993
Zhang, J., Tian, H., You, Y., Liang, X., Ouyang, Z., Pan, N., & Pan, S. (2023) · doi:10.22541/essoar.169566477.71146215/v1
Adverse Sampling Conditions May Determine the Sampling Protocol for Earthworm MonitoringPreprint
Euteneuer, P., & Butt, K. R. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4772552
Adverse Soil Conditions May Determine the Sampling Protocol for Earthworm MonitoringPreprint
Euteneuer, P., & Butt, K. R. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4821365
Pérez-Roig, C., Videla, M., Mujtar, V. A. E., Tittonell, P. A., & Potapov, A. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4865127
Earthworm Contributions to Agricultural Sustainability
Pelosi, C., Petit-dit-Grézériat, L., Ratsiatosika, O., & Blanchart, É. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-64510-5_10 · Cited by 1
Hackenberger, D. K., Marchán, D. F., & Hackenberger, B. K. (2025) · Zootaxa · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.5589.1.20
The Biodiversity of Agricultural Soils
Gonod, L. V., Joimel, S., & Niboyet, A. (2025) · doi:10.1002/9781394361809.ch2
Evaluation of soil fauna diversity in maize crops using Shannon, Margalef, and Pielou indices
da Rosa, G. B., Follmann, D. N., Lúcio, A. D., Jacques, R. J. S., Portela, V. O., & Marchioro, V. S. (2024) · Acta Scientiarum Agronomy · doi:10.4025/actasciagron.v47i1.69432
Within-Field Flower Strips Effect on Collembola Communities Over TimePreprint
Coulibaly, S., Chassain, J., Gonod, L. V., Artru, M., Carville, O. D., Felin, S., Gardarin, A., & Joimel, S. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5180336
JOSEPH, I., HASSAN, W. I., & YAKUBU, B. A. (2025) · Journal of Entomology and Agronomy Studies · doi:10.70382/bjeas.v7i1.007
Over a Decade of Minimum Tillage: Effects on Soil Organic Carbon in Selected Danish Farmer FieldsPreprint
Hauggaard‐Nielsen, H., Brandt, N. F. Z., Holmes, E., & Christensen, A. A. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5254621
Use of quantitative PCR to detect and differentiate earthworm species
Schon, N. L., Hsu, P.-C., Loeffen, S. M., Devey, K., & Hill, R. J. (2025) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106208
Impact of agricultural land use and monsoon on earthworms and crop production in West Bengal, India
Bhowmik, A., & Panda, S. (2025) · Community Ecology · doi:10.1007/s42974-025-00260-7
Józefowska, A., Loaiza‐Usuga, J. C., & Schmidt, O. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-40292-0.00036-4
Self-citationDiversity of soil microorganisms and their impact on soil functions
Yadegari, A. H., & Etesami, H. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-34055-0.00004-7
Cannon, N. D., Booyse, Y., Murray, P. J., & Crotty, F. (2025) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/sum.70143
Within-field flower strips effect on Collembola assemblages over time
Coulibaly, S., Chassain, J., Gonod, L. V., Artru, M., Carville, O. D., Felin, S., Gardarin, A., & Joimel, S. (2025) · Pedobiologia · doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2025.151109
Intraspecific trait shift reflects earthworm response to land-use intensification in peat grasslands
Woudstra, L. C., Ellers, J., Hefting, M. M., Craft, T. B., & Berg, M. P. (2025) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106763
Veklenko, Y. A., Корнійчук, О., Petrychenko, V., Voronetska, I., Dmytruk, Y., & Cherlinka, V. (2025) · Feeds and Feed Production · doi:10.31073/kormovyrobnytstvo2025100-05
Feedbacks between plants and soil biota
Bardgett, R. D. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191858710.003.0004
Bardgett, R. D. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191858710.002.0005
Bardgett, R. D. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191858710.003.0001
Bardgett, R. D. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191858710.002.0006
Some conclusions and future perspectives
Bardgett, R. D. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191858710.003.0008
Bardgett, R. D. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191858710.003.0006
Bardgett, R. D. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191858710.003.0002
Soil biota and sustainability goals
Bardgett, R. D. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191858710.003.0007
Soil biota and ecosystem functioning
Bardgett, R. D. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191858710.003.0003
Araujo, P. I., Simón, J., Portela, S. I., Restovich, S. B., & Austin, A. T. (2026) · Acta Oecologica · doi:10.1016/j.actao.2026.104164
Carbon Farming: An Expository, Inter-Disciplinary Survey
Priyanka, V., Charan, G., Suresh, R. P., Sunkara, T., Patil, M., Sagar, K., Trivedi, A., Soumya, K., Paul, S., Hadimani, P., et al. (2025) · Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · doi:10.1007/s41745-026-00499-7
Planting food forests can increase soil biodiversity in agricultural landscapes of Northwest Europe
van der Zanden, I., Moereels, L., Schelfhout, S., SMEDT, P. D., Lock, K., Dekoninck, W., Korthals, G. W., van der Putten, W. H., Verheyen, K., & Veen, G. F. (2026) · npj Biodiversity · doi:10.1038/s44185-026-00125-w
de Paz, J. M., Iglesias, D. J., Miguel, S. M., Peiró, E., & Visconti, F. (2026) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy16070747
Jameson, J., McDonnell, K. P., Vijayarajan, V. B. A., & Forristal, P. D. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18094270
Blum, J. A., Leyrer, V., Schuster, R., Wehner, K., Kandeler, E., & Marhan, S. (2026) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2026.107112
Dehon, F., Doclot, A., Warnau, M., Dondaine, B., Dufrêne, M., Vereecken, N. J., Thonar, C., Leclercq, N., & Boeraeve, F. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6832319
Delmotte, S., Versini, A., Brauman, A., Decaëns, T., Vermeire, M.-L., Gamelin, V., Huat, J., & Brunel, C. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7000651
Górka, N., Palimąka, K., & Masłoń, A. A. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18136574
Heller, O., D’Hose, T., Euteneuer, P., Fér, M., Goberna, M., Jarvis, N., Munkholm, L. J., Vasquez, E. M. A., Bragazza, L., Ghiasi, S., et al. (2026) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/sum.70247
Zhang, Y., Liu, L., Li, K., Zhang, X., Han, G., Cao, Y., Wei, Z., Zhang, J., Ning, T., Han, H., et al. (2026) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2026.107489
Inter-row vegetation benefits soil invertebrates in Mediterranean organic vineyards
Blaya, R., Rocher, L., Capowiez, Y., Bischoff, A., Gros, R., Millon, A., Ponel, P., Pelosi, C., & Blight, O. (2026) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.131106
Metadata
- Authors
- Briones, M. J. I., & Schmidt, O.
- Affiliations
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Briones, María Jesús I.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-05-31
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4396-4419
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2611958349
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 161
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 3.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
- Universidad Nacional del Litoral
- Bioforsk
- Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
- South Australian Research and Development Institute
- Norges Miljø- og Biovitenskapelige Universitet
- Universitat de Lleida
- Thünen-Institut
- Agroscope
- Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau
- Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
- Wageningen University and Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant and soil sciences
- Keywords
- earthworms, conventional tillage, reduced tillage, no-tillage, conservation agriculture, earthworm abundance, earthworm biomass, Lumbricus terrestris, anecic earthworms, epigeic earthworms, soil disturbance, glyphosate, soil properties, soil fauna, soil ecosystem services
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Animals, Feeding Behavior, Oligochaeta, Population Dynamics, Soil, Soil Microbiology, Ecosystem, Biomass
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review