The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep soil inventories reveal that impacts of cover crops and compost on soil carbon sequestration differ in surface and subsurface soils
Open accessAbstract
Increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) via organic inputs is a key strategy for increasing long‐term soil C storage and improving the climate change mitigation and adaptation potential of agricultural systems. A long‐term trial in California's Mediterranean climate revealed impacts of management on SOC in maize‐tomato and wheat–fallow cropping systems. SOC was measured at the initiation of the experiment and at year 19, at five depth increments down to 2 m, taking into account changes in bulk density. Across the entire 2 m profile, SOC in the wheat–fallow systems did not change with the addition of N fertilizer, winter cover crops (WCC), or irrigation alone and decreased by 5.6% with no inputs. There was some evidence of soil C gains at depth with both N fertilizer and irrigation, though high variation precluded detection of significant changes. In maize‒tomato rotations, SOC increased by 12.6% (21.8 Mg C/ha) with both WCC and composted poultry manure inputs, across the 2 m profile. The addition of WCC to a conventionally managed system increased SOC stocks by 3.5% (1.44 Mg C/ha) in the 0–30 cm layer, but decreased by 10.8% (14.86 Mg C/ha) in the 30–200 cm layer, resulting in overall losses of 13.4 Mg C/ha. If we only measured soil C in the top 30 cm, we would have assumed an increase in total soil C increased with WCC alone, whereas in reality significant losses in SOC occurred when considering the 2 m soil profile. Ignoring the subsoil carbon dynamics in deeper layers of soil fails to recognize potential opportunities for soil C sequestration, and may lead to false conclusions about the impact of management practices on C sequestration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security
Lal, R. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1097396 · Cited by 8,376
Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change
Davidson, E. A., & Janssens, I. A. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04514 · Cited by 6,919
Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world
BATJES, N. H. (1996) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01386.x · Cited by 3,213
Minasny, B., Malone, B. P., McBratney, A. B., Angers, D. A., Arrouays, D., Chambers, A., Chaplot, V., Chen, Z.-S., Cheng, K., Das, B. S., et al. (2017) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.002 · Cited by 2,239 · cited 2×
“CO 2 emissions aims to sequester C in agricultural soils (French Ministry of Agriculture & Food, 2018), attracting widespread invest‐ ment, scrutiny, and criticism (Amundson & Biardeau, 2018; Chabbi et al., 2017; Minasny et al., 2017).”
Deep soil organic matter—a key but poorly understood component of terrestrial C cycle
Rumpel, C., & Kögel-Knabner, I. (2011) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0391-5 · Cited by 1,848
Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage
Lange, M., Eisenhauer, N., Sierra, C. A., Bessler, H., Engels, C., Griffiths, R. I., Mellado-Vázquez, P. G., Malik, A. A., Roy, J., Scheu, S., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7707 · Cited by 1,742
Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils via cultivation of cover crops – A meta-analysis
Poeplau, C., & Don, A. (2015) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.024 · Cited by 1,651
Aguilera, E., Lassaletta, L., Gattinger, A., & Gimeno, B. S. (2013) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.02.003 · Cited by 482 · cited 1×
“…Mediterranean agroecosystems represent some of the most diverse, productive, and economically valuable systems in the world, we know surprisingly little about how management affects SOC in these systems (Aguilera, Lassaletta, Gattinger, & Gimeno, 2013; DeGryze et al., 2004; Suddick et al., 2010).”
West, T. O., & Six, J. (2007) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9173-8 · Cited by 360
Lee, D. K., Owens, V. N., & Doolittle, J. J. (2007) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2006.0152 · Cited by 181
Cited by
McClelland, S. C., Paustian, K., & Schipanski, M. E. (2021) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2278 · Cited by 268
Brewer, K. M., & Gaudin, A. C. M. (2020) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107936 · Cited by 99
Self-citationValid inferences about soil carbon in heterogeneous landscapes
Stanley, P., Spertus, J., Chiartas, J., Stark, P. B., & Bowles, T. (2023) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116323 · Cited by 95
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tautges, N. E., Chiartas, J. L., Gaudin, A. C. M., O'Geen, A. T., Herrera, I., & Scow, K. M.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-08-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3753-3766
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2961618348
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 21.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep soil inventories reveal that impacts of cover crops and compost on soil carbon sequestration differ in surface and subsurface soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/gcb.14762
- The paper
- Tautges, N. E., Chiartas, J. L., Gaudin, A. C. M., O'Geen, A. T., Herrera, I., & Scow, K. M. (2019). Deep soil inventories reveal that impacts of cover crops and compost on soil carbon sequestration differ in surface and subsurface soils. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14762
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.