The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of long‐term straw return on soil organic carbon storage and sequestration rate in North China upland crops: A meta‐analysis
Abstract
Soil organic carbon (SOC) is essential for soil fertility and climate change mitigation, and carbon can be sequestered in soil through proper soil management, including straw return. However, results of studies of long‐term straw return on SOC are contradictory and increasing SOC stocks in upland soils is challenging. This study of North China upland agricultural fields quantified the effects of several fertilizer and straw return treatments on SOC storage changes and crop yields, considering different cropping duration periods, soil types, and cropping systems to establish the relationships of SOC sequestration rates with initial SOC stocks and annual straw C inputs. Our meta‐analysis using long‐term field experiments showed that SOC stock responses to straw return were greater than that of mineral fertilizers alone. Black soils with higher initial SOC stocks also had lower SOC stock increases than did soils with lower initial SOC stocks (fluvo‐aquic and loessial soils) following applications of nitrogen‐phosphorous‐potassium (NPK) fertilizer and NPK+S (straw). Soil C stocks under the NPK and NPK+S treatments increased in the more‐than‐20‐year duration period, while significant SOC stock increases in the NP and NP+S treatment groups were limited to the 11‐ to 20‐year period. Annual crop productivity was higher in double‐cropped wheat and maize under all fertilization treatments, including control (no fertilization), than in the single‐crop systems (wheat or maize). Also, the annual soil sequestration rates and annual straw C inputs of the treatments with straw return (NP+S and NPK+S) were significantly positively related. Moreover, initial SOC stocks and SOC sequestration rates of those treatments were highly negatively correlated. Thus, long‐term straw return integrated with mineral fertilization in upland wheat and maize croplands leads to increased crop yields and SOC stocks. However, those effects of straw return are highly dependent on fertilizer management, cropping system, soil type, duration period, and the initial SOC content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704 · cited 1×
“Means, standard deviations or standard errors, and the number of replicates are required for meta-analysis (Hedges et al., 1999; Luo, Hui, & Zhang, 2006), but in most of the studies we used, the standard deviations or standard errors that would allow us to calculate sample variances were not…”
MethodSoil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis
Guo, L. B., & Gifford, R. M. (2002) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1354-1013.2002.00486.x · Cited by 3,972
Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Rates by Tillage and Crop Rotation: A Global Data Analysis
West, T. O., & Post, W. M. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1930 · Cited by 2,215 · cited 1×
“…have paid attention to C sequestration and possibilities for mitigating SOC loss by optimizing appropriate crop rotation, proper application rates for organic and inorganic fertilizers, conservation tillage, and integrated soil fertility management (Srinivasarao et al., 2012; West & Post, 2002).”
BackgroundProductivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture
Pittelkow, C. M., Liang, X., Linquist, B. A., van Groenigen, K. J., Lee, J., Lundy, M. E., van Gestel, N., Six, J., Venterea, R. T., & van Kessel, C. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13809 · Cited by 1,688
China’s environment in a globalizing world
Liu, J., & Diamond, J. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/4351179a · Cited by 1,643
Horrigan, L., Lawrence, R. S., & Walker, P. (2002) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.02110445 · Cited by 1,192
Effects of straw carbon input on carbon dynamics in agricultural soils: a meta‐analysis
Liu, C., Lu, M., Cui, J., Li, B., & Fang, C. (2014) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12517 · Cited by 1,168
STATISTICAL ISSUES IN ECOLOGICAL META-ANALYSES
Gurevitch, J., & Hedges, L. V. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1142:siiema]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,081
ELEVATED CO2STIMULATES NET ACCUMULATIONS OF CARBON AND NITROGEN IN LAND ECOSYSTEMS: A META-ANALYSIS
Luo, Y., Hui, D., & Zhang, D. (2006) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/04-1724 · Cited by 1,034
Soil carbon saturation: concept, evidence and evaluation
Stewart, C. E., Paustian, K., Conant, R. T., Plante, A. F., & Six, J. (2007) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-007-9140-0 · Cited by 911
Metadata
- Authors
- Berhane, M., Xu, M., Liang, Z., Shi, J., Wei, G., & Tian, X.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-02-24
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2686-2701
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W3004233859
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 23.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of long‐term straw return on soil organic carbon storage and sequestration rate in North China upland crops: A meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/gcb.15018
- The paper
- Berhane, M., Xu, M., Liang, Z., Shi, J., Wei, G., & Tian, X. (2020). Effects of long‐term straw return on soil organic carbon storage and sequestration rate in North China upland crops: A meta‐analysis. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.