Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 537

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Temperature sensitivity of SOM decomposition is linked with a K‐selected microbial community

Li, Hui, Yang, Shan, Semenov, Mikhail V., Yao, Fei, Ye, Ji, Bu, Rencang, Ma, Ruiao, Lin, Junjie, Kurganova, Irina, Wang, Xugao, Deng, Ye, Kravchenko, Irina, Jiang, Yong, Kuzyakov, Yakov·2021·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Temperature sensitivity (Q 10) of soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition is a crucial parameter to predict the fate of soil carbon (C) under global warming. Nonetheless, the response pattern of Q 10 to continuous warming and the underlying mechanisms are still under debate, especially considering the complex interactions between Q 10, SOM quality, and soil microorganisms. We examined the Q 10 of SOM decomposition across a mean annual temperature (MAT) gradient from −1.9 to 5.1°C in temperate mixed forest ecosystems in parallel with SOM quality and bioavailability, microbial taxonomic composition, and functional genes responsible for organic carbon decomposition. Within this temperature gradient of 7.0°C, the Q 10 values increased with MAT, but decreased with SOM bioavailability. The Q 10 values increased with the prevalence of K‐strategy of soil microbial community, which was characterized by: (i) high ratios of oligotrophic to copiotrophic taxa, (ii) ectomycorrhizal to saprotrophic fungi, (iii) functional genes responsible for degradation of recalcitrant to that of labile C, and (iv) low average 16S rRNA operon copy number. Because the recalcitrant organic matter was mainly utilized by the K‐strategists, these findings independently support the carbon quality‐temperature theory from the perspective of microbial taxonomic composition and functions. A year‐long incubation experiment was performed to determine the response of labile and recalcitrant C pools to warming based on the two‐pool model. The decomposition of recalcitrant SOM was more sensitive to increased temperature in southern warm regions, which might attribute to the dominance of K‐selected microbial communities. It implies that climate warming would mobilize the larger recalcitrant pools in warm regions, exacerbating the positive feedback between increased MAT and CO 2 efflux. This is the first attempt to link temperature sensitivity of SOM decomposition with microbial eco‐strategies by incorporating the genetic information and disentangling the complex relationship between Q 10 and soil microorganisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcb.15593

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 110 references

Cited by

See all 537

Metadata

Authors
Li, H., Yang, S., Semenov, M. V., Yao, F., Ye, J., Bu, R., Ma, R., Lin, J., Kurganova, I., Wang, X., Deng, Y., Kravchenko, I., Jiang, Y., & Kuzyakov, Y.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-25
Volume
27
Issue
12
Pages
2763-2779
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W3135500534
Cited by
537
References
110
FWCI
36.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temperature sensitivity of SOM decomposition is linked with a K‐selected microbial community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/gcb.15593
The paper
Li, H., Yang, S., Semenov, M. V., Yao, F., Ye, J., Bu, R., Ma, R., Lin, J., Kurganova, I., Wang, X., Deng, Y., Kravchenko, I., Jiang, Y., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2021). Temperature sensitivity of SOM decomposition is linked with a K‐selected microbial community. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15593

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.