Cited by 94Bioenergy crop production and managementMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsHeavy metals in environment

Potential of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) for paired phytoremediation and bioenergy production

Open access
Rheay, Hanah T., Omondi, Emmanuel C., Brewer, Catherine E.·2021·GCB Bioenergy

Abstract

Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) is a multi‐use crop that has been investigated for its potential use in phytoremediation of heavy metals, radionuclides, and organic contaminants, and as a feedstock for bioenergy production. A review of research literature indicates that hemp is a suitable crop for phytoremediation, and a competitive option for bioenergy. Coupling phytoremediation and bioenergy production from a single hemp crop is a potential solution to overcoming the economic constraints of phytoremediation projects. The current challenge is ensuring that the extracted contaminants are not introduced into the consumer marketplace. After several decades of limited research on hemp in the United States, the purpose of this review is to identify the knowledge available for hemp applications in phytoremediation or in production of bioenergy, and if and how those two purposes have been combined. The literature shows that hemp growth has been demonstrated successfully at the field scale for phytoremediation and in several bioenergy conversion technologies. Little is known about the fate of contaminants during hemp growth or during post‐harvest processing, especially the relationships between hemp genetics, metabolomics, and contaminant partitioning. Complicating the understanding is the expectation that contaminant fate will be dependent on the contaminant type, the concentration in the material, and the processing methods. Before hemp from phytoremediation applications can be used for bioenergy, the fractionation of heavy metals, radionuclides, and/or organic compounds during transesterification, anaerobic digestion, fermentation, and/or combustion of hemp must be evaluated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcbb.12782

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rheay, H. T., Omondi, E. C., & Brewer, C. E.
Affiliations
New Mexico State University (US)
Corresponding author
Brewer, Catherine E.
Venue
GCB Bioenergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12-07
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
525-536
ISSN
  • 1757-1693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-1707
OpenAlex
W3099795341
Cited by
94
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9
FWCI
14.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • GCB Bioenergy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
New Mexico State University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
Keywords
hemp, Cannabis sativa, phytoremediation, bioenergy, heavy metals, radionuclides, organic pollutants, transesterification, anaerobic digestion, fermentation, combustion, metabolomics, contaminant partitioning, biomass feedstock

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review