Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Altered root traits due to elevated CO2: a meta‐analysis

Nie, Ming, Lu, Meng, Bell, Jennifer, Raut, Swastika, Pendall, Elise·2013·Global Ecology and Biogeography

Abstract

Aim: Plant root traits regulate belowground C inputs, soil nutrient and water uptake, and play critical roles in determining sustainable plant production and consequences for ecosystem C storage. However, the effects of elevated CO 2 on root morphology and function have not been well quantified. We reveal general patterns of root trait responses to elevated CO 2 from field manipulative experiments. Location: N orth A merica, E urope, O ceania, A sia. Methods: The meta‐analysis approach was used to examine the effects of CO 2 elevation on 17 variables associated with root morphology, biomass size and distribution, C and N concentrations and pools, turnover and fungal colonization from 110 published studies. Results: Elevated CO 2 increased root length (+26.0%) and diameter (+8.4%). Elevated CO 2 also stimulated total root (+28.8%), fine root (+27.7%) and coarse root biomass (+25.3%), demonstrating strong responses of root morphology and biomass. Elevated CO 2 increased the root:shoot ratio (+8.5%) and decreased the proportion of roots in the topsoil (–8.4%), suggesting that plants expand rooting systems. In addition, elevated CO 2 decreased N concentration (–7.1%), but did not affect C concentration, and thus increased the C:N ratio (+7.8%). Root C (+29.3%) increased disproportionately relative to root N pools (+9.4%) under elevated CO 2. Functional traits were also strongly affected by elevated CO 2, which increased respiration (+58.9%), rhizodeposition (+37.9%) and fungal colonization (+3.3%). Main conclusions: These results suggest that elevated CO 2 promoted root morphological development, root system expansion and C input to soils, implying that the sensitive responses of root morphology and function to elevated CO 2 would increase long‐term belowground C sequestration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/geb.12062

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
Nie, M., Lu, M., Bell, J., Raut, S., & Pendall, E.
Venue
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-17
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
1095-1105
ISSN
  • 1466-822X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-8238
OpenAlex
W1846513595
Cited by
237
References
2
FWCI
9.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Altered root traits due to elevated CO2: a meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/geb.12062
The paper
Nie, M., Lu, M., Bell, J., Raut, S., & Pendall, E. (2013). Altered root traits due to elevated CO2: a meta‐analysis. Global Ecology and Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12062

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.