The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Re‐working mobilities: Emergent geographies of employment‐related mobility
Open accessAbstract
Over the last decade, an increasing number of geographers and other social science researchers have deployed the insights of the new mobilities paradigm to study work, labour, and employment. These insights include attention to the meanings, practices, and politics of work‐related movement as well as to multiple spatial and temporal scales and types of im/mobility for and at work. In a review of this literature, we find five different vantage points on “re‐working” mobility: articulations of labour migration with other forms of mobility; geometries of power in the daily journey to work; embodiment and affect in work‐related movement; mobility and labour across the life course; and co‐mobilities of workers, ideas, and things. We argue that on whole, a mobility lens offers a “critical phenomenology” of the dynamic relations between the everyday lifeworlds and broader political, social, and economic contexts of both paid and unpaid work. This is especially important as work involves ever more complex patterns and experiences of mobility and is more deeply entwined with the mobilities of other domains of social life. We conclude by considering the rich implications of “re‐working mobilities” for methodological diversity and for animating both mobilities studies and labour studies as critical geographical endeavors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Cited by 6,200
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006) · Environment and Planning A Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a37268 · Cited by 6,172
On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World
Cresswell, T. (2006) · Cited by 2,468
Self-citationTowards a Politics of Mobility
Cresswell, T. (2010) · Environment and Planning D Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d11407 · Cited by 2,377
Self-citationEditorial: Mobilities, Immobilities and Moorings
Hannam, K., Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006) · Mobilities · doi:10.1080/17450100500489189 · Cited by 2,163
Kaufmann, V., Bergman, M. M., & Joye, D. (2004) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00549.x · Cited by 1,214
On the Edge: Living With Global Capitalism
Hutton, W., & Giddens, A. (2000) · Cited by 1,019
Empire of the senses : the sensual culture reader
Howes, D. (2005) · Cited by 898
Hanson, S., & Pratt, G. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203397411 · Cited by 864
Gender and mobility: new approaches for informing sustainability
Hanson, S. (2010) · Gender Place & Culture · doi:10.1080/09663690903498225 · Cited by 799
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Ackers L., 2005, Scientific migration within the EU: Introduction to the special issue, Innovations, 18, 275
- Adey P., 2010, Mobility
- Datta K., 2008, Mobile masculinities: Men, migration and low paid work in London
- Fincham B., 2009, Mobile methodologies
- Hyndman J., 2004, Mapping women, making politics: Feminist perspectives on political geography, 169
- Massey D., 1994, Space, place and gender
- Mitchell D., 2012, They saved the crops: Labor, landscape, and the struggle over industrial farming in Bracero‐era California (Geographies of Justice and Social Transformation, number 10)
- Urry J., 2007, Mobilities
Cited by
Visitation patterns across mobility groups: wandering, commuting, and exploring
Hołubowska, O., Smolak, K., Brum-Bastos, V., & Sila-Nowicka, K. (2026) · Journal of Geographical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10109-026-00501-x
Metadata
- Authors
- Dorow, S., Roseman, S. R., & Cresswell, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
- Trinity College (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Dorow, Sara
- Venue
- Geography Compass
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-10-17
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 1749-8198 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2766951477
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 7.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Geography Compass (publishedVersion)
- Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) (acceptedVersion)
- Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Appl ID 895‐2011‐1019)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Historical Geography and Geographical Thought
- Keywords
- new mobilities paradigm, work-related mobility, employment mobility, labor migration, commuting, embodiment, affect, life course, critical phenomenology, everyday work, paid and unpaid work
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review