Mandibular third molar coronectomy in older adults and its effects on oral health‐related quality of life
Open accessAbstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of coronectomy on postoperative quality of life in older adults. Background: Coronectomy is an alternative to complete surgical removal of a mandibular third molar that lies close to the inferior alveolar nerve. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included patients >60 years old who had an indication for coronectomy of a mandibular third molar. Patients were asked to complete the Dutch version of the Oral Health Impact Profile‐14 (OHIP‐14) daily during the first postoperative week. Postoperative pain, swelling, limited mouth opening, chewing ability and infection were also recorded. Furthermore, the effect of the impaction pattern, state of eruption, presence of preoperative pathology, patient health status according to the American Society of Anaesthesiologists score, gender, smoking on the postoperative OHIP‐14 and pain scores were investigated. Results: Thirty patients (16 males, 14 females) with a mean age of 71.2 (SD 8.3, range 60–91) years were included in the study. OHIP‐14 and pain scores were highest on the first postoperative day and gradually declined during the first postoperative week. Patients who underwent coronectomy of a fully impacted mandibular third molar had significantly higher OHIP‐14 scores on the first postoperative day than those who underwent coronectomy on a (partially) erupted mandibular third molar. We did not observe any postoperative complications up to 1 year after the surgery. Conclusion: Mandibular third molar coronectomy seems to present a valid treatment option in older adults.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 2
- Authors
- Simons, R. N., Lindeboom, J. A., Tuk, J. G., & de Lange, J.
- Affiliations
- Ziekenhuis Amstelland (NL)
- Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery Amsterdam University Medical Center Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Corresponding author
- Lindeboom, Jerome A.
- ORCID
- Lindeboom, Jerome A.
- Venue
- Gerodontology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-10-27
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 269-276
- ISSN
- 0734-0664 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2358
- PMC
- PMC12106943
- OpenAlex
- W4403799332
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Gerodontology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Radiography and Imaging
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Keywords
- mandibular third molar, coronectomy, older adults, oral health-related quality of life, OHIP-14, postoperative pain, impacted third molar, postoperative complications, inferior alveolar nerve
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Mandible, Middle Aged, Molar, Third, Oral Health, Postoperative Pain, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Tooth Extraction, Tooth, Impacted, Tooth Crown
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review