Cited by 21Gastrointestinal motility and disordersPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesFrailty in Older Adults

Prevalence and risk factors of constipation and pollakisuria among older home‐care patients

Komiya, Hitoshi, Umegaki, Hiroyuki, Asai, Atsushi, Kanda, Shigeru, Maeda, Keiko, Nomura, Hideki, Kuzuya, Masafumi·2019·Geriatrics & Gerontology International

Abstract

Aim: The prevalence of constipation and prevalence of pollakisuria among older patients receiving home medical care have not been reported, and risk factors for these symptoms are not clear in this setting. The present study sought to determine the prevalence and risk factors of constipation and pollakisuria among older patients receiving home medical care in Japan. Methods: This study utilized data from patients in the Observational Study of Nagoya Elderly with Home Medical Care (n = 153). We carried out univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses with the presence of constipation or pollakisuria as the dependent variable to evaluate the relationships between constipation or pollakisuria and several covariates. Results: The prevalence of constipation and pollakisuria were 56.9% and 15.7%, respectively. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that constipation was associated with Charlson Comorbidity Index score, polypharmacy and pollakisuria, and pollakisuria was associated with constipation and insomnia. Cardiovascular disease was inversely associated with constipation. Conclusions: The prevalence of constipation among home‐care patients was as high as that reported for nursing home residents and higher than that among community‐dwelling individuals. Clinicians should be aware of increased constipation risk among home‐care patients, particularly for those with a high Carlson Comorbidity Index score, polypharmacy and/or pollakisuria. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 277–281.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ggi.13610

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Komiya, H., Umegaki, H., Asai, A., Kanda, S., Maeda, K., Nomura, H., & Kuzuya, M.
Affiliations
  • Nagoya University (JP)
  • Sanei Clinic Komaki Japan
  • Minami Health‐Medical Cooperative Kaname Hospital Nagoya Japan
  • Mokuren Clinic Department of Home Medical Care Nagoya Japan
  • Aichi Clinic Nagoya Japan
Corresponding author
Umegaki, Hiroyuki
Venue
Geriatrics & Gerontology International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-01-09
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
277-281
ISSN
  • 1444-1586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0594
OpenAlex
W2910551558
Cited by
21
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Geriatrics and gerontology international/Geriatrics & gerontology international (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Health Labor Sciences Research Grant (H24YA003)
  • Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare Japan
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
constipation, urinary frequency, older adults, home medical care, prevalence, risk factors, Charlson Comorbidity Index, polypharmacy, insomnia, cardiovascular disease, nursing home residents
MeSH terms
Aged, Constipation, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Japan, Male, Risk Factors, Urination Disorders, Prevalence, Laxatives, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review