Assessment of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Mass Flux and Distributions in a Lake System Using Sediment Bed Passive Flux Meters and Ceramic Dosimeters

Abstract

Per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent in the environment due to their chemical stability and can spread quickly in a lake system due to mixing. Passive samplers allow for time‐weighted average concentration monitoring and the ability to detect low concentrations, which are difficult to measure with conventional grab sampling. This study demonstrates the feasibility of deploying both ceramic dosimeters and Sediment Bed Passive Flux Meters (SBPFMs) to assess time integrated PFAS concentrations and fluxes, respectively, at a historically contaminated PFAS lake near Baden‐Baden, Germany. Long‐term surface water grab samples resulted in the detection of PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFHpA, PFOA, PFNA, PFDA, PFBS, PFHxS, and PFOS at a total concentration of approximately 1 μg/L. Dosimeters were deployed for 66 and 126 d, resulting in detected concentrations ranging from approximately 250 to 380 ng/L and 120 to 460 ng/L, respectively. The 66 d deployment resulted in the detection of PFPeA, PFHxA, PFHpA, and PFOA, whereas the 126 d deployment additionally detected PFBA, PFNA, PFDA, PFUnDA, PFDoDA, PFTeDA, PFBS, PFPeS, PFOS, PFNS, and PFDS. SBPFMs resulted in the detection of PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFHpA, PFOA, PFNA, PFUnA, PFTrDA, and PFBS and the determination of a total mass discharge of 5.6 g/d into the lake. Overall, dosimeters and SBPFMs are more sensitive than grab samples at detecting PFAS at low concentrations and can be used to better understand spatial distribution of PFAS in a lake system.