Cited by 89Health disparities and outcomesAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesAging, Health, and Disability

What do older people experiencing loneliness think about primary care or community based interventions to reduce loneliness? A qualitative study in England

Open access
Kharicha, Kalpa, Iliffe, Steve, Manthorpe, Jill, Chew-Graham, Carolyn A., Cattan, Mima, Goodman, Claire, Kirby-Barr, Maggie, Whitehouse, Janet H. +1 more·2017·Health & Social Care in the Community

Abstract

Loneliness in later life is a common problem with poor health outcomes. However, interventions to prevent or ameliorate loneliness have a weak evidence base. The views of older people experiencing or at risk of loneliness in the community are important in identifying features of potential support, but have been little studied. Twenty-eight community dwelling people, aged 65 and over who reported being 'lonely much of the time' or identified as lonely from the de Jong Gierveld six-item loneliness scale in a larger study, participated in in-depth interviews, between June 2013 and May 2014. Views and experiences on seeking support from primary care and community based one-to-one and group based activities, including social and shared interest groups, were explored. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was conducted by a multidisciplinary team, including older people. Using two different measures of loneliness enabled a spectrum of loneliness experience to be explored. Two-thirds of the participants were the 'younger old' and all were able to leave their homes independently. Older people with characteristics of loneliness were generally knowledgeable about local social and community resources but, for the majority, community and primary care based services for their loneliness were not considered desirable or helpful at this point in their lives. However, group based activities with a shared interest were thought preferable to one-to-one support (befriending) or groups with a social focus. Descriptions of support as being for loneliness and specific to older people discouraged engagement. Older people experiencing or at risk of loneliness did not consider that primary care has a role in alleviating loneliness because it is not an illness. They thought primary care practitioners lack understanding of non-physical problems and that a good relationship was necessary to discuss sensitive issues like loneliness. For many, loneliness was a complex and private matter that they wished to manage without external support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/hsc.12438

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 89

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Age UK (2010) Loneliness and Isolation Evidence Review. Age UK, London.
  2. Moriarty J. & Manthorpe J. (2012) Diversity in Older People and Access to Services – An Evidence Review. Age UK, London Available at: http://www.ageuk.org.uk/Documents/EN-GB/For-professionals/Research/Equalities_Evidence_Review_Moriarty_2012.pdf?dtrk=true (accessed on 10/02/2017).

Authors
Kharicha, K., Iliffe, S., Manthorpe, J., Chew-Graham, C. A., Cattan, M., Goodman, C., Kirby-Barr, M., Whitehouse, J. H., & Walters, K.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Keele University (GB)
  • Northumbria University (GB)
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
  • Lay Member; London UK
  • Lay Member; Essex UK
Corresponding author
Kharicha, Kalpa
Venue
Health & Social Care in the Community
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-23
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
1733-1742
ISSN
0966-0410 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2590752062
Cited by
89
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
7.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health & Social Care in the Community (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Keele Research Repository (Keele University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Medical Research Council (G1001822/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
loneliness, older adults, primary care, community-based intervention, loneliness interventions, befriending, group activities, social support, primary care physicians, community resources
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, England, Female, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Single Person, Social Behavior, Social Support, Professional Role, Qualitative Research, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review