Cited by 41Nursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

Enhancing primary care support for informal carers: A scoping study with professional stakeholders

Open access
Peters, Michele, Rand, Stacey, Fitzpatrick, Ray·2020·Health & Social Care in the Community

Abstract

Informal carers (i.e. people who provide unpaid care to family and/or friends) are crucial in supporting people with long-term conditions. Caring negatively impacts on carers' health and experiences of health services. Internationally and nationally, policies, legislation, professional guidance and research advocate for health and care services to do more to support carers. This study explored the views of health and social care providers, commissioners and policy makers about the role and scope for strengthening health service support for carers. Twenty-four semi-structured interviews, with 25 participants were conducted, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed by thematic analysis. Three main themes emerged: (a) identifying carers, (b) carer support, and (c) assessing and addressing carer needs. Primary care, and other services, were seen as not doing enough for carers but having an important role in identifying and supporting carers. Two issues with carer identification were described, first people not self-identifying as carers and second most services not being proactive in identifying carers. Participants thought that carer needs should be supported by primary care in collaboration with other health services, social care and the voluntary sector. Concerns were raised about primary care, which is under enormous strain, being asked to take on yet another task. There was a clear message that it was only useful to involve primary care in identifying carers and their needs, if benefit could be achieved through direct benefits such as better provision of support to the carer or indirect benefit such as better recognition of the carer role. This study highlights that more could be done to address carers' needs through primary care in close collaboration with other health and care services. The findings indicate the need for pilots and experiments to develop the evidence base. Given the crucial importance of carers, such studies should be a high priority.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/hsc.12898

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In contrast, Western families may utilize respite care or other primary care support, which helps distribute the caregiving burden and alleviate stress.

    “In contrast, Western families may utilize respite care or other primary care support, which helps distribute the caregiving burden and alleviate stress.”

    From The burdens, coping strategies, and unmet needs of family caregivers of Chinese patients with lymphoma receiving commercial CAR-T-cell therapy: A qualitative study (2026) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Findings (‘Assessing and addressing carers needs’; page unavailable) identify respite services as a potential benefit of assessing carers’ needs, and the Introduction says policies giving carers free time and emotional support are associated with better outcomes. The paper does not establish that Western families use these services or that they distribute caregiving duties and alleviate stress; its Discussion says effective primary-care support for carers is not yet well established. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Ateş, G., Ebenau, A. F., Busa, C., Csikos, Á., Hasselaar, J., Jaspers, B., … Radbruch, L. (2018). "Never at ease" ‐ family carers within integrated palliative care: A multinational, mixed method study. BMC Palliative Care, 17(1), 39 10.1186/s12904-018-0291-7 29490657 PMC5831577 · DOI
  2. Beesley, L. (2006). Informal care in England. Wanless social care review: Retrieved from London: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/informal-care-england-wanless-background-paper-lucinda-beesley2006.pdf
  3. Bruening, R., Sperber, N., Miller, K., Andrews, S., Steinhauser, K., Wieland, G. D., … Van Houtven, C. (2019). Connecting caregivers to support: Lessons learned from the VA Caregiver Support Program. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 733464818825050, 10.1177/0733464818825050 30658547 · DOI
  4. Calvo‐Perxas, L., Vilalta‐Franch, J., Litwin, H., Turro‐Garriga, O., Mira, P., & Garre‐Olmo, J. (2018). What seems to matter in public policy and the health of informal caregivers? A cross‐sectional study in 12 European countries. PLoS ONE, 13(3), e0194232 10.1371/journal.pone.0194232 29518147 PMC5843287 · DOI
  5. Carduff, E., Finucane, A., Kendall, M., Jarvis, A., Harrison, N., Greenacre, J., & Murray, S. A. (2014). Understanding the barriers to identifying carers of people with advanced illness in primary care: Triangulating three data sources. BMC Family Practice, 15, 48 10.1186/1471-2296-15-48 24690099 PMC3992158 · DOI
  6. Carduff, E., Jarvis, A., Highet, G., Finucane, A., Kendall, M., Harrison, N., … Murray, S. A. (2016). Piloting a new approach in primary care to identify, assess and support carers of people with terminal illnesses: A feasibility study. BMC Family Practice, 17, 18 10.1186/s12875-016-0414-2 26864056 PMC4750245 · DOI
  7. Courtin, E., Jemiai, N., & Mossialos, E. (2014). Mapping support policies for informal carers across the European Union. Health Policy, 118(1), 84– 94. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.07.013 25132460 · DOI
  8. Ewing, G., Brundle, C., Payne, S., & Grande, G. (2013). The Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) for use in palliative and end‐of‐life care at home: A validation study. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 46(3), 395– 405. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.09.008 23245452 · DOI
  9. Fusch, P. L., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408– 1416.
  10. Greenwood, N., Mackenzie, A., Habibi, R., Atkins, C., & Jones, R. (2010). General practitioners and carers: A questionnaire survey of attitudes, awareness of issues, barriers and enablers to provision of services. BMC Family Practice, 11, 100 10.1186/1471-2296-11-100 21172001 PMC3016257 · DOI
  11. Guberman, N., Keefe, J., Fancey, P., & Barylak, L. (2007). 'Not another form!': Lessons for implementing carer assessment in health and social service agencies. Health and Social Care in the Community, 15(6), 577– 587. 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00718.x 17956410 · DOI
  12. Guberman, N., Nicholas, E., Nolan, M., Rembicki, D., Lundh, U., & Keefe, J. (2003). Impacts on practitioners of using research‐based carer assessment tools: Experiences from the UK, Canada and Sweden, with insights from Australia. Health and Social Care in the Community, 11(4), 345– 355. 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2003.00434.x 14629206 · DOI
  13. Hiel, L., Beenackers, M. A., Renders, C. M., Robroek, S. J., Burdorf, A., & Croezen, S. (2015). Providing personal informal care to older European adults: Should we care about the caregivers' health? Preventive Medicine, 70, 64– 68. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.10.028 25450490 · DOI
  14. Janse, B., Huijsman, R., de Kuyper, R. D., & Fabbricotti, I. N. (2014). The effects of an integrated care intervention for the frail elderly on informal caregivers: A quasi‐experimental study. BMC Geriatrics, 14, 58 10.1186/1471-2318-14-58 24885828 PMC4021048 · DOI
  15. Knowles, S., Combs, R., Kirk, S., Griffiths, M., Patel, N., & Sanders, C. (2016). Hidden caring, hidden carers? Exploring the experience of carers for people with long‐term conditions. Health and Social Care in the Community, 24(2), 203– 213. 10.1111/hsc.12207 25706665 PMC4744729 · DOI
  16. Larkin, M., Henwood, M., & Milne, A. (2019). Carer‐related research and knowledge: Findings from a scoping review. Health and Social Care in the Community, 27(1), 55– 67. 10.1111/hsc.12586 29846020 · DOI
  17. Lee, K. C., Yiin, J. J., & Chao, Y. F. (2016). Effect of integrated caregiver support on caregiver burden for people taking care of people with cancer at the end of life: A cohort and quasi‐experimental clinical trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 56, 17– 26. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.01.002 26794928 · DOI
  18. Lefranc, A., Perol, D., Plantier, M., Chatelain, P., de Rohan‐Chabot, H., & Schell, M. (2017). Assessment of informal caregiver's needs by self‐administered instruments: A literature review. European Journal of Public Health, 27(5), 796– 801. 10.1093/eurpub/ckx103 28957482 · DOI
  19. Morgan, G. (2016). Unpaid carers: Where is public health? Public Health, 139, 239– 240. 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.06.001 27372229 · DOI
  20. Peters, M., Jenkinson, C., Doll, H., Playford, E. D., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2013). Carer quality of life and experiences of health services: A cross‐sectional survey across three neurological conditions. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 103 10.1186/1477-7525-11-103 23800348 PMC3698129 · DOI
  21. Rand, S., Malley, J., & Forder, J. (2019). Are reasons for care‐giving related to carers' care‐related quality of life and strain? Evidence from a survey of carers in England. Health and Social Care in the Community, 27(1), 151– 160. 10.1111/hsc.12634 30063106 PMC6334528 · DOI
  22. Rand, S., Malley, J., Forder, J., & Netten, A. (2015). Factor structure and construct validity of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers (ASCOT‐Carer). Quality of Life Research, 24(11), 2601– 2614. 10.1007/s11136-015-1011-x 26038214 PMC4592701 · DOI
  23. Sadler, E., Potterton, V., Anderson, R., Khadjesari, Z., Sheehan, K., Butt, F., … Sandall, J. (2019). Service user, carer and provider perspectives on integrated care for older people with frailty, and factors perceived to facilitate and hinder implementation: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. PLoS ONE, 14(5), e0216488 10.1371/journal.pone.0216488 31083707 PMC6513075 · DOI
  24. Schonevegel, L. (2013). Macmillan briefing on the care bill. Retrieved from https://professionals.carers.org/sites/default/files/supporting-carers-an-action-guide-for-general-practitioners-and-their-teams-second-edition-5877.pdf
  25. Sheets, D. J., Black, K., & Kaye, L. W. (2014). Who cares for caregivers? Evidence‐based approaches to family support. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 57(6–7), 525– 530. 10.1080/01634372.2014.920606 25105462 · DOI
  26. Silva, A. L., Teixeira, H. J., Teixeira, M. J., & Freitas, S. (2013). The needs of informal caregivers of elderly people living at home: An integrative review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 27(4), 792– 803. 10.1111/scs.12019 23289859 · DOI
  27. Simon, C., & Kendrick, T. (2001). Informal carers–the role of general practitioners and district nurses. British Journal of General Practice, 51(469), 655– 657. 11510395 PMC1314076
  28. Temple, J. B., & Dow, B. (2018). The unmet support needs of carers of older Australians: Prevalence and mental health. International Psychogeriatrics, 30(12), 1849– 1860. 10.1017/S104161021800042X 29798735 · DOI
  29. Thomas, G. P., Saunders, C. L., Roland, M. O., & Paddison, C. A. (2015). Informal carers' health‐related quality of life and patient experience in primary care: Evidence from 195,364 carers in England responding to a national survey. BMC Family Practice, 16, 62 10.1186/s12875-015-0277-y 25975608 PMC4446949 · DOI
  30. Valentini, J., Ruppert, D., Magez, J., Stegbauer, C., Bramesfeld, A., & Goetz, K. (2016). Integrated care in German mental health services as benefit for relatives–a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry, 16, 48 10.1186/s12888-016-0760-6 26921216 PMC4769565 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peters, M., Rand, S., & Fitzpatrick, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Kent (GB)
Corresponding author
Peters, Michele
Venue
Health & Social Care in the Community
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-11-26
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
642-650
ISSN
  • 0966-0410 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2524
OpenAlex
W2990733937
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health & Social Care in the Community (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research (PR‐UN‐0409‐10108)
  • Department of Health, Australian Government
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
informal caregivers, primary care, caregiver support, chronic disease, carer needs assessment, inter-agency cooperation, health and social care, carer recognition, health service commissioning
MeSH terms
Stakeholder Participation, Aged, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Patient Care, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Social Support, Caregivers, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review