Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment – a guide for the non‐specialist

Open access
Welsh, T. J., Gordon, A. L., Gladman, J. R.·2014·International Journal of Clinical Practice

Abstract

Comprehensive geriatric assessmenta guide for the non-specialist Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is the most comprehensively researched model for healthcare delivery to frail older patients.It has been shown, through a series of high-quality research studies and subsequent meta-analyses, to deliver measurable health improvements for frail older people.Although it is well understood by specialists in care of older people, it remains unrecognised by many non-specialists.Because it is a multifaceted complex intervention, whose title and acronym do not convey its full meaning, it may be misunderstood by those unfamiliar with it.Given the demonstrated benefits from CGA for frail older patientswho now increasingly represent 'core business' to healthcare professionals of all types, across all developed healthcare economiesit is important that this model of healthcare delivery is more widely understood.The purpose of this article is to explain, for a non-specialist clinical readership, what CGA is and how it works. What is comprehensive geriatric assessment?Comprehensive geriatric assessment is not a term which is widely used outside of specialist circles despite being in existence for over 20 years.It is often taken to be synonymous with 'geriatric medicine'.This is not the case.CGA is a process which is used to manage frail or vulnerable older people.It is interdisciplinarymeaning that it takes account of inputs not only from doctors but also nurses and allied health professionals.It is multidimensionalmeaning that it takes account not just of medical diagnoses but also functional impairments and the environmental and social issues which affect patient wellbeing.It produces problem lists and develops goal-driven interventions to tackle these.Ultimately, it provides and coordinates an integrated plan for treatment, rehabilitation, support and long-term care.Recognising that CGA is more than an assessment process, some people prefer the term geriatric evaluation and management (GEM).In this article, we use the term CGA simply because this is most commonly used in the evidence base.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijcp.12313

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Welsh, T. J., Gordon, A. L., & Gladman, J. R.
Venue
International Journal of Clinical Practice
Published
2013-10-07
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
290-293
ISSN
  • 1368-5031 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-1241
OpenAlex
W2076346478
Cited by
280
References
3
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comprehensive geriatric assessment – a guide for the non‐specialist. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ijcp.12313
The paper
Welsh, T. J., Gordon, A. L., & Gladman, J. R. (2014). Comprehensive geriatric assessment – a guide for the non‐specialist. International Journal of Clinical Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12313

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.