Cited by 6Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthClinical practice guidelines implementationBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Does management of lipid lowering differ between specialists and primary care: Insights from GOAL Canada

Open access
Langer, Anatoly, Tan, Mary, Goodman, Shaun G., Grégoire, Jean, Lin, Peter J., Mancini, G. B. John, Stone, James A., Leiter, Lawrence A.·2021·International Journal of Clinical Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We studied whether significant differences in care gaps exist between specialists and primary care physicians (PCPs). METHODS: GOAL Canada enrolled patients with CVD or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and LDL-C > 2.0 mmol/L despite maximally tolerated statin therapy. During follow-up, physicians received online reminders of treatment recommendations based on Canadian Guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 177 physicians (58% PCPs) enrolled 2009 patients; approximately half of the patients were enrolled by each physician group. Patients enrolled by specialists were slightly older (mean age 63 years vs 62), female (45% vs 40%), Caucasian (77% vs 65%), and had a slightly higher systolic pressure and lower heart rate. Patients enrolled by specialists had less frequent history of FH, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease and liver disease but more frequent history of coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation and premature family history of CVD. There was no significant baseline difference in LDL-C, HDL-C or non-HDL-C, although total cholesterol and triglycerides were slightly higher in patients managed by PCPs. At baseline, PCPs were more likely to use statins (80% vs 73%, P = .0002) and other therapies such as niacin or fibrate (10% vs 6%, P = .0006) but similar use of ezetimibe (24% vs 27%, P = .15). At the end of follow-up, specialists used less statins (70% vs 77%, P = .0005) and other therapies (6% vs 10%, P = .007) but more ezetimibe (45% vs 38%, P = .01) and the same frequency of PCSK9i (28% vs 27%, P = .65). The proportion of patients achieving the recommended LDL-C level of 2.0 mmol/L or below (primary endpoint) was similar at last available visit between specialists and PCPs (44% vs 42%, P = .32). CONCLUSION: Despite minor differences in the clinical profile of their patients, both PCPs and specialists actively participate in the management of lipid-lowering therapy in high-risk CVD patients and experience similar challenges and care gaps.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijcp.13861

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are knowledge gaps in PCPs when compared to specialists in other common conditions, such as sexual dysfunction and HLD management.

    “There are knowledge gaps in PCPs when compared to specialists in other common conditions, such as sexual dysfunction and HLD management.13,14”

    From The use of an artificial intelligence platform OpenEvidence to augment clinical decision-making for primary care physicians (2025) · cites this paper as [14]

    For lipid-lowering management, the Discussion identifies knowledge or treatment gaps in both PCPs and specialists, rather than a greater knowledge gap in PCPs. The Abstract conclusion says the groups experienced similar care gaps, and recommended LDL-C attainment was similar (44% versus 42%). This paper does not address the sentence’s separate point about sexual dysfunction. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, et al; Cholesterol Treatment Trialists (CTT) Collaborators. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005;366:1267-78.
  2. Waters DD, Brotons C, Chiang CW, et al. Lipid Treatment Assessment Project 2:Amultinational sur- vey to evaluate the proportion of patients achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals. Circulation 2009;120:28-34.
  3. Saposnik G, Goodman SG, Leiter LA, et al. Applying the evidence: Do patients with stroke, coronary artery disease, or both achieve similar treatment goals? Stroke 2009;40:1417-24.
  4. Hackam DG, Leiter LA, Yan AT, et al. Missed opportunities for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Canada. Can J Cardiol 2007; 23:1124-30.
  5. Yan AT, Yan RT, Tan M, et al. Contemporary management of dyslipidemia in high-risk patients: targets still not met. Am J Med 2006;119:676-83.
  6. Banegas JR, Vegazo O, Serrano P, et al. The gap between dyslipidemia control perceived by physicians and objective control patterns in Spain. Atherosclerosis 2006;188:420-4.
  7. Ko DT, Mamdani M, Alter DA. Lipid-lowering therapy with statins in high risk elderly patients: the treatment-risk paradox. JAMA 2004;291:1864-970.
  8. Petrella RJ, Merikle E, Jones J. Prevalence and treatment of dyslipidemia in Canadian primary care: a retrospective cohort analysis. Clin Ther 2007;29: 742-50.
  9. Rapezzi C, Biagini E, Bellis P, et al. Exploring the gap between National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines and clinical practice in secondary care: results of a cross-sectional study involving over 10 000 patients followed in different specialty settings across Italy. J Cardiovasc Med 2008; 9:878-87.
  10. Langer A, Tan M, Goodman SG, Gregoire J, Lin PJ, Mancini GBH, Stone JA, Wills C, Spindler C, Leiter LA GOAL Canada: Physician Education and Support Can Improve Patient Management CJC Open 2020;2:49-54.
  11. Goodman SG, Langer A, Bastien NR, et al. Prevalence of dyslipidemia in statin treated patients in Canada: results of the Dyslipidemia International Study (DYSIS). Can J Cardiol 2010;26:e330e5.
  12. Chen G, Farris MS, Cowling T, Colgan SM, Xiang P, Pericleous L, Rogoza RM, Tai MH, Anderson T. Treatment and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Management in Patients Diagnosed With Clinical Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Alberta. Can J Cardiol. 2019 Jul;35(7):884-891
  13. Grima DT, Leiter LA, Goodman SG, Attard CL, Chow CM, Langer A. How Many Cardio vascular Events Can Be Prevented With Optimal Management of High-Risk Canadians? Can J Cardiol 2008;24(5):363-68.
  14. Langer A, Tan M, Cieza T et al. Can Clinical Reminder Help Optimize the Use of Secondary Prevention Therapies in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome? Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Med 2017;1:1-5..
  15. Katz PM, Mendelsohn AA, Goodman SG, Langer A, Teoh H, Leiter LA, Use of a Treatment Optimization Algorithm Involving Statin-Ezetimibe Combination Aids in Achievement of Guideline-Based Low-Density Lipoprotein Targets in Patients With Dyslipidemia at High Vascular Risk Guideline-Based Undertaking to Improve Dyslipidemia Management in Canada (GUIDANC). Can J of Cardiol; 2011(27):138-145.
  16. Tsang JLY, Mendelsohn A, Tan MKK, et al. Discordance between physicians' estimation of patient cardiovascular risk and use of evidence-based medical therapy. Am J Cardiol 2008;102:1142-1145
  17. Rogers AM, Ramanath VS, Grzybowski M, et al The association between guideline-based treatment instructions at the point of discharge and lower 1-year mortality in Medicare patients after acute myocardial infarction: the American College of Cardiology's Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) initiative in Michigan. Am Heart J. 2007;154:461-469.
  18. Arnold SV, Spertus JA, Masoudi FA, et al Beyond Medication Prescription as Performance Measures. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1791-1801
  19. Kucher N, Koo S, Quiroz R, Cooper JM, Paterno MD, Soukonnikov B, Goldhaber SZ. Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):969-77.
  20. Rishi Puri, MBBS, PhD 2 ; Todd Anderson, MD 3 , Steven E. Nissen, MD 2 et al. Effect of Evolucomab on Coronary Disease Progression in Statin Treated Patients. JAMA. 2016; 16(22): 2373-2384.
  21. Cannon C, Blazing M. Ezetimibe add to Statin therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes. N Eng J Med 2015; 372:2387-2397
  22. Shah BR, Hux JE, Laupacis A, Zinman B, van Walraven C. Clinical Inertia in Response to Inadequate Glycemic Control: Do Specialists Differ From Primary Care Physicians? Diabetes Care 2005 Mar;28(3):600- 6. DISCLOSURES: AL has received on behalf of the Canadian Heart Research Centre research grant support from Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Servier and Sanofi . GBJM has received grants and/or honoraria from Amgen, Sanofi, HLS Therapeutices, Esperion, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen/Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, Novo Nordisk. LAL has received research grant support from Astra Zeneca, Amgen, Kowa, The Medicines Company, and Sanofi. He has also served as a consultant for Astra Zeneca, Amgen, Esperion, HLS, Merck, The Medicines Company, and Sanofi JG has received speaker/consulting honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, HLS Therapeutics, Janssen/Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi, Servier, Sunovion;

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langer, A., Tan, M., Goodman, S. G., Grégoire, J., Lin, P. J., Mancini, G. B. J., Stone, J. A., & Leiter, L. A.
Affiliations
  • Canadian Heart Research Centre (CA)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • Montreal Heart Institute (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Langer, Anatoly
Venue
International Journal of Clinical Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12-14
Volume
75
Issue
4
Pages
e13861-e13861
ISSN
  • 1368-5031 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-1241
OpenAlex
W3110633358
Cited by
6
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Amgen Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
lipid-lowering therapy, LDL cholesterol, familial hypercholesterolemia, cardiovascular disease, care gaps, ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors, statins, treatment guidelines
MeSH terms
Ezetimibe, Anticholesteremic Agents, Canada, Female, Goals, Humans, Lipids, Cholesterol, LDL, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Specialization, Treatment Outcome, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review