The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainable fashion consumption and the fast fashion conundrum: fashionable consumers and attitudes to sustainability in clothing choice
Abstract
The fashion industry has recently heeded the call for sustainability and ethically sound production. There has been, however, a reluctant uptake of these products with many consumers and a seeming conflict with existing ‘fast fashion’ desires in this area. This study explores the attitudes of fashion consumers toward sustainable products, ethical fashion purchasing and their subsequent behaviour. The research applies the developmental theory model to a fashion context, finding fashion consumers can be categorized into one of three groups: ‘Self’ consumers, concerned with hedonistic needs, ‘Social’ consumers, concerned with social image and ‘Sacrifice’ consumers who strive to reduce their impact on the world. These different groups view fast fashion in conflicting ways and subsequent implications for marketing sustainably produced fashion products to each group are, thus, significantly different.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064
The Evolving Self: Problem and Process in Human Development
Kegan, R. (1982) · doi:10.4159/9780674039414 · Cited by 1,920
An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption
Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0640-9 · Cited by 891
Cited by
The UCL–Lancet Commission on Migration and Health: the health of a world on the move
Abubakar, I., Aldridge, R. W., Devakumar, D., Orcutt, M., Burns, R., Barreto, M. L., Dhavan, P., Fouad, F. M., Groce, N., Guo, Y., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32114-7 · Cited by 941
Sustainable fashion: current and future research directions
Mukendi, A., Davies, I., Glozer, S., & McDonagh, P. (2020) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-02-2019-0132 · Cited by 325
Diddi, S., Yan, R.-N., Bloodhart, B., Bajtelsmit, V., & McShane, K. (2019) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2019.02.009 · Cited by 280
Mohiuddin, M., Al Mamun, A., Syed, F., Mehedi Masud, M., & Su, Z. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10051534 · Cited by 233
Consumer behavior in sustainable fashion: A systematic literature review and future research agenda
Busalim, A., Fox, G., & Lynn, T. (2022) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12794 · Cited by 197
Metadata
- Authors
- McNeill, L., & Moore, R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Consumer Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04-13
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 212-222
- ISSN
- 1470-6423 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-6431
- OpenAlex
- W1789163495
- Cited by
- 693
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 37.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainable fashion consumption and the fast fashion conundrum: fashionable consumers and attitudes to sustainability in clothing choice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ijcs.12169
- The paper
- McNeill, L., & Moore, R. (2015). Sustainable fashion consumption and the fast fashion conundrum: fashionable consumers and attitudes to sustainability in clothing choice. International Journal of Consumer Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12169
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.