The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Editorial: The Future of Writing and Reviewing for IJMR
Open accessAbstract
In this editorial, the co‐editors‐in‐chief undertake a number of tasks related to International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR). They begin by reviewing the objectives set out by Macpherson and Jones in their 2010 editorial (IJMR, 12, pp. 107–113). The benefits of publishing in IJMR for scholars at various stages of their careers are then discussed. The section outlining the progress of IJMR over the last four years sets out the main reasons why so many papers are desk rejected by the co‐editors. The main criteria for writing an analytical literature review of the type that the editors aspire to publish in the Journal are then discussed. The objectives are not simply to reduce the number of desk rejects, but also to encourage authors to be more ambitious and innovative in their approaches to reviews of the literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The business model: Recent developments and future research
Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311406265 · Cited by 4,790
Writing Narrative Literature Reviews
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311 · Cited by 1,482
RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses
Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, J., & Pawson, R. (2013) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-21 · Cited by 1,374
Qualitative Metasynthesis: Reflections on Methodological Orientation and Ideological Agenda
Thorne, S., Jensen, L., Kearney, M. H., Noblit, G., & Sandelowski, M. (2004) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732304269888 · Cited by 749 · cited 1×
“The objective of adopting a meta-ethnographic approach to the literature is to provide greater clarity regarding both the empirical results of previous studies and the nature of concepts and theories adopted by researchers (see Campbell et al. 2003; Mays et al. 2005; Thorne et al. 2004).”
BackgroundRealist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research
Rycroft-Malone, J., McCormack, B., Hutchinson, A. M., DeCorby, K., Bucknall, T. K., Kent, B., Schultz, A., Snelgrove-Clarke, E., Stetler, C. B., Titler, M., et al. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-33 · Cited by 742
Evidence-based policy: the promise of ‘realist synthesis’
Pawson, R. (2002) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/135638902401462448 · Cited by 729
RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews
Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, J., & Pawson, R. (2013) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-20 · Cited by 610
RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses
Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, J., & Pawson, R. (2013) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12095 · Cited by 385
RAMESES publication standards: meta‐narrative reviews
Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, J., & Pawson, R. (2013) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12092 · Cited by 324
Editors' Comments: Styles of Theorizing and the Social Organization of Knowledge
(2013) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2013.0085 · Cited by 271
Cited by
The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research
Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4 · Cited by 1,319
Adams, R. J., Smart, P., & Huff, A. S. (2017) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12102 · Cited by 995
Debating big data: a literature review on realizing value from big data
Günther, W. A., Rezazade Mehrizi, M. H., Huysman, M., & Feldberg, F. (2017) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2017.07.003 · Cited by 880
Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research
Hiebl, M. R. W. (2023) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428120986851 · Cited by 635
Mariani, M. M., Perez‐Vega, R., & Wirtz, J. (2022) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21619 · Cited by 631
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, O., & Gatrell, C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Management Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 249-264
- ISSN
- 1460-8545 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2370
- OpenAlex
- W1845478194
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Editorial: The Future of Writing and Reviewing for IJMR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ijmr.12038
- The paper
- Jones, O., & Gatrell, C. (2014). Editorial: The Future of Writing and Reviewing for IJMR. International Journal of Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
