Cited by 57Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Effectiveness of self‐management programmes in diabetes management: A systematic review

Vas, Aldrin, Devi, Elsa Sanatombi, Vidyasagar, Sudha, Acharya, Raviraja, Rau, Nileshwar Radhakrishna, George, Anice, Jose, Tessy, Nayak, Baby·2017·International Journal of Nursing Practice

Abstract

Background Diabetes is a major noncommunicable disease, which is increasing, and approximately 415 million people are affected around the globe. Since diabetes is a lifelong disease, patients require better understanding and knowledge of the condition to become self-reliant in making diabetes-related decisions. Aims This systematic review was performed to assess the effectiveness of diabetes self-management programs in people with type 2 diabetes. Methods A comprehensive literature search was undertaken to identify all published English language articles through EBSCO discovery services in the following electronic database: Science Direct, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, MEDLINE, and Access Medicine. Studies were published from January 2000 to October 2015. The initial search retrieved 37 566 studies and based on the inclusion criteria, 14 studies were selected for review. Results Of 14 studies, most findings favoured diabetes self-management. But the overall effectiveness of individual interventions was not conclusive. A wide variety of interventions was used including diabetes education as a major component in self-management programs. Conclusion Interventions used varied strategies in differing composition, and further work is needed to find out the effectiveness of individual interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijn.12571

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A systematic review of published studies suggested that successful educational programs lowered HbA1c levels by 0.4 to 1.7 percentage points.

    “A systematic review of published studies44 suggested that successful educational programs lowered HbA1c levels by 0.4 to 1.7 percentage points.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 57

Authors
Vas, A., Devi, E. S., Vidyasagar, S., Acharya, R., Rau, N. R., George, A., Jose, T., & Nayak, B.
Affiliations
  • Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
  • Kasturba Medical College Hospital (IN)
  • Yenepoya University (IN)
Corresponding author
Devi, Elsa Sanatombi
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-31
Volume
23
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 1322-7114 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-172X
OpenAlex
W2741773436
Cited by
57
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, diabetes education, program effectiveness, patient empowerment, diabetes self-management interventions
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review