Smart phone accessibility and mHealth use in a limited resource setting
Abstract
Aim: To determine smartphone access and use including future opportunities for mHealth and potential ethical implications among health care professionals practicing at a health care facility in Bengaluru, India. Background: The evolution of smart phones can provide convenient, portable, and rapid access to resources for health care professionals. While mobile phone accessibility has improved in recent years in many low and middle‐income countries, the use of smart phones to address health priorities remains limited in some limited resource settings. Design: A quantitative descriptive design was used. Methods: A survey was administered in November of 2016 to nurses and physicians at a tertiary care hospital in India. Results/Findings: All respondents had a mobile phone, and the majority owned a smart phone that was used for text messaging, email, accessing internet, and downloading apps. Participants recommended smart phone use to improve health care provider access to continuing education and to improve patient knowledge about health. Physicians had better access to mHealth resources compared with nurses. Conclusion: Credible, evidence‐based, affordable mobile applications are needed to provide a platform for continuing health education to health professionals and patients in India and limited resource settings. Nurses need equitable access to mHealth resources to build successful mHealth initiatives.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
mHealth solutions are increasingly being adopted in LMICs.
“mobile health (mHealth) solutions are increasingly being adopted in LMICs [16,17].”
From mUzima Mobile Electronic Health Record (EHR) System: Development and Implementation at Scale (2021) · cites this paper as [17]
Cites
Sondaal, S. F. V., Browne, J. L., Amoakoh-Coleman, M., Borgstein, A., Miltenburg, A. S., Verwijs, M., & Klipstein-Grobusch, K. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154664 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mudiyanselage, K. W. W., De Santis, K. K., Jörg, F., Saleem, M., Stewart, R., Zeeb, H., & Busse, H. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-023-17417-6 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
mUzima Mobile Electronic Health Record (EHR) System: Development and Implementation at Scale
Were, M. C., Savai, S., Mokaya, B., Mbugua, S., Ribeka, N., Cholli, P., & Yeung, A. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/26381 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“To address some of the challenges and gaps with tethered EHRS that can only be accessed from within facilities, mobile health (mHealth) solutions are increasingly being adopted in LMICs [16,17].”
BackgroundParent preferences for text messages containing infant feeding advice
Brown, C., Davis, K. E., Habiba, N., Massey-Stokes, M., & Warren, C. (2020) · mHealth · doi:10.21037/mhealth.2019.11.03 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Garner, S. L., Sudia, T., & Rachaprolu, S.
- Affiliations
- Baylor University (US)
- Bangalore Baptist Hospital (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Garner, Shelby L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Practice
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-11-20
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1322-7114 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-172X
- OpenAlex
- W2769618303
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 2.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Nursing Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
- Keywords
- smartphone accessibility, mobile health, healthcare workers, nurses, physicians, continuing education, mobile application, resource-limited settings, health care ethics, Bangalore
- MeSH terms
- Smartphone, Adult, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, India, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Telemedicine, Cell Phone, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review