Cited by 11Spinal Cord Injury ResearchPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Cognitive behaviour therapy in adults with spinal cord injury: A scoping review

Open access
Yang, Shu‐Hua, Mu, Pei‐Fan, Huang, Wen‐Cheng·2023·International Journal of Nursing Practice

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to report on the extent and range of the research evaluating cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) in adults with spinal cord injury. Background: Spinal cord injury is a devastating event that can lead to permanent neurologic deficit. Compared with the average person, spinal cord injury (SCI) patients are at twice the risk of developing mood disorders, highlighting vulnerability of SCI patients' mental states which can be easily hurt. CBT is the most commonly used psychosocial intervention. Design: This was a scoping review. Review method: Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Airiti Library) were searched for articles published between 1990 and 2021. Google Scholar was utilized to search additional articles listed in the reference lists of included articles. Results: Overall, 16 articles met the inclusion criteria, with the majority reporting on CBT, that focused on psychological distress and neuropathic pain. The core concept of intervention included disease identification, cognitive distortion/modification and coping strategies. Conclusions: There were significant knowledge gaps on the interventions' content and effectiveness for psychological distress of persons with SCI. Development of multifaceted cognitive behaviour interventions, especially to strengthen self‐identity and to inspire patients' hope, is needed. Further research is required to investigate the long‐term effectiveness of CBT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijn.13078

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two main waves of cognitive behavioral therapies and coping-oriented strategies have been utilized in prior research on individuals with SCI to alleviate depression and anxiety.

    “Two main waves of cognitive behavioral therapies and coping-oriented strategies have been utilized in prior research on individuals with SCI to alleviate depression and anxiety [9-11].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 44 · Cited by 11

Authors
Yang, S., Mu, P., & Huang, W.
Affiliations
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Mu, Pei‐Fan
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-06-30
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
e13078-e13078
ISSN
  • 1322-7114 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-172X
OpenAlex
W4283726252
Cited by
11
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, spinal cord injury, psychological distress, neuropathic pain, mood disorders, coping strategies, cognitive distortions, self-identity, hope, psychosocial interventions, adults
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Humans, Spinal Cord Injuries, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review