Cognitive behaviour therapy in adults with spinal cord injury: A scoping review
Open accessAbstract
Aim: The aim of this study is to report on the extent and range of the research evaluating cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) in adults with spinal cord injury. Background: Spinal cord injury is a devastating event that can lead to permanent neurologic deficit. Compared with the average person, spinal cord injury (SCI) patients are at twice the risk of developing mood disorders, highlighting vulnerability of SCI patients' mental states which can be easily hurt. CBT is the most commonly used psychosocial intervention. Design: This was a scoping review. Review method: Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Airiti Library) were searched for articles published between 1990 and 2021. Google Scholar was utilized to search additional articles listed in the reference lists of included articles. Results: Overall, 16 articles met the inclusion criteria, with the majority reporting on CBT, that focused on psychological distress and neuropathic pain. The core concept of intervention included disease identification, cognitive distortion/modification and coping strategies. Conclusions: There were significant knowledge gaps on the interventions' content and effectiveness for psychological distress of persons with SCI. Development of multifaceted cognitive behaviour interventions, especially to strengthen self‐identity and to inspire patients' hope, is needed. Further research is required to investigate the long‐term effectiveness of CBT.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two main waves of cognitive behavioral therapies and coping-oriented strategies have been utilized in prior research on individuals with SCI to alleviate depression and anxiety.
“Two main waves of cognitive behavioral therapies and coping-oriented strategies have been utilized in prior research on individuals with SCI to alleviate depression and anxiety [9-11].”
From Mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions for people with spinal cord injury: a scoping review. (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 44 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Yang, S., Mu, P., & Huang, W.
- Affiliations
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Mu, Pei‐Fan
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Practice
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-06-30
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e13078-e13078
- ISSN
- 1322-7114 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-172X
- OpenAlex
- W4283726252
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Nursing Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Keywords
- cognitive behavioral therapy, spinal cord injury, psychological distress, neuropathic pain, mood disorders, coping strategies, cognitive distortions, self-identity, hope, psychosocial interventions, adults
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Humans, Spinal Cord Injuries, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review