The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Population Exchange and its Impact on Literacy, Occupation and Gender – Evidence from the Partition of India
Abstract
How do large scale, involuntary migrations and population exchanges affect sending and receiving communities? We examine the case of the partition of India in which approximately 17 million people moved within four years, resulting in one of the largest and most rapid population exchanges in human history. We find large effects due to the migration on a district's educational, occupational, and gender composition. Due to higher education levels amongst migrants, districts with 10 per cent greater inflows saw their literacy rates increase by 3 percentage points, while a 10 per cent increase in outflows reduced literacy by 1.2 percentage points. Due to disparities in the amount of land vacated by migrants, Indian districts with 10 per cent greater inflows saw a decline of 11 per centin agricultural occupations. Districts that experienced high inflows and outflows also experienced changes in gender composition. While the partition, driven along religious lines, increased religious homogenization within communities, our results suggest that this was accompanied by increased educational and occupational differences within religious groups. We conclude that these compositional effects, in addition to an aggregate population impact, are probably features of involuntary migrations and population exchanges and, as in the case of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, can have important long‐term consequences.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For districts along the northwestern border, a 10 percent increase in refugee inflows resulted in an increase in literacy of nearly 36 percent.
“Bharadwaj, Khwaja, and Mian (2015) find that for districts along the northwestern border a 10 percent increase in refugee inflows 'resulted in an increase in literacy of nearly 36 percent' (Bharadwaj, Khwaja, and Mian, 2015, p. 91).”
From Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India (2019) · cites this paper as Bharadwaj, Khwaja, and Mian, 2015
Complexities and uncertainties involved in the land-to-land transfer of occupation meant that some refugee farmers had to move into non-agricultural professions.
“Second, the complexities and uncertainties involved in the 'land-to-land transfer of occupation' for agricultural refugees meant that some refugee farmers had to move into non-agricultural professions (Bharadwaj, Khwaja, and Mian, 2015, p. 96).”
From Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India (2019) · cites this paper as Bharadwaj, Khwaja, and Mian, 2015
Citations
Cites
The Spoils of Partition: Bengal and India, 1947–1967
Chatterji, J. (2007) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511497384 · Cited by 253
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Bharadwaj P., 2008, The Big March: Migratory Flows after Partition of British India, Economic and Political Weekly, 43, 35
- Bloom D., 1999, Demographic Change and Economic Growth in Asia
- Bopegamage A., 1957, Delhi: A Study in Urban Sociology
- Bose S., 1988, Modern South Asia: History, Culture, Political Economy
- Cheema P I., 2000, The Politics of the Punjab Boundary Award
- Davis K., 1951, The Population of India and Pakistan
- 10.2307/2137600 · DOI
- Hill K., 2005, The partition of India: new demographic estimates of associated population change
- 10.1093/jrs/10.1.19 · DOI
- Kudaisya G., 2000, The Aftermath of Partition in South Asia
- Shahid S, 1993, Disastrous Twilight: A Personal Record of the Partition of India
- Sims H., 1988, Political Regimes, Public Policy and Economic Development: Agricultural Performance and Rural Change in the Two Punjabs
- Singh A., 2001, The Partition Omnibus
- Srivastava R., 2008, An Overview of Migration in India, its Impacts and Key Issues
- Vakil C.N., 1950, Economic Consequences of Divided India
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India
Bharadwaj, P., & Ali Mirza, R. (2019) · Explorations in Economic History · doi:10.1016/j.eeh.2019.05.001 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bharadwaj, P., Khwaja, A. I., & Mian, A.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- ORCID
- Bharadwaj, Prashant
- Venue
- International Migration
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-05-05
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 90-106
- ISSN
- 0020-7985 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2435
- OpenAlex
- W1977128801
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Migration (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › South Asian Studies and Diaspora
- Social Sciences › Demography › Migration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical Geography
- Keywords
- population exchange, Partition of India, involuntary migration, literacy, occupational structure, gender composition, religious homogenization, composition effects, agricultural occupations, educational inequality, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review