Cited by 27Migration and Labor DynamicsSouth Asian Studies and DiasporaMigration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical Geography

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Population Exchange and its Impact on Literacy, Occupation and Gender – Evidence from the Partition of India

Bharadwaj, Prashant, Khwaja, Asim I., Mian, Atif·2015·International Migration

Abstract

How do large scale, involuntary migrations and population exchanges affect sending and receiving communities? We examine the case of the partition of India in which approximately 17 million people moved within four years, resulting in one of the largest and most rapid population exchanges in human history. We find large effects due to the migration on a district's educational, occupational, and gender composition. Due to higher education levels amongst migrants, districts with 10 per cent greater inflows saw their literacy rates increase by 3 percentage points, while a 10 per cent increase in outflows reduced literacy by 1.2 percentage points. Due to disparities in the amount of land vacated by migrants, Indian districts with 10 per cent greater inflows saw a decline of 11 per centin agricultural occupations. Districts that experienced high inflows and outflows also experienced changes in gender composition. While the partition, driven along religious lines, increased religious homogenization within communities, our results suggest that this was accompanied by increased educational and occupational differences within religious groups. We conclude that these compositional effects, in addition to an aggregate population impact, are probably features of involuntary migrations and population exchanges and, as in the case of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, can have important long‐term consequences.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/imig.12039

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For districts along the northwestern border, a 10 percent increase in refugee inflows resulted in an increase in literacy of nearly 36 percent.

    “Bharadwaj, Khwaja, and Mian (2015) find that for districts along the northwestern border a 10 percent increase in refugee inflows 'resulted in an increase in literacy of nearly 36 percent' (Bharadwaj, Khwaja, and Mian, 2015, p. 91).”

    From Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India (2019) · cites this paper as Bharadwaj, Khwaja, and Mian, 2015

  • Complexities and uncertainties involved in the land-to-land transfer of occupation meant that some refugee farmers had to move into non-agricultural professions.

    “Second, the complexities and uncertainties involved in the 'land-to-land transfer of occupation' for agricultural refugees meant that some refugee farmers had to move into non-agricultural professions (Bharadwaj, Khwaja, and Mian, 2015, p. 96).”

    From Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India (2019) · cites this paper as Bharadwaj, Khwaja, and Mian, 2015

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Bharadwaj P., 2008, The Big March: Migratory Flows after Partition of British India, Economic and Political Weekly, 43, 35
  2. Bloom D., 1999, Demographic Change and Economic Growth in Asia
  3. Bopegamage A., 1957, Delhi: A Study in Urban Sociology
  4. Bose S., 1988, Modern South Asia: History, Culture, Political Economy
  5. Cheema P I., 2000, The Politics of the Punjab Boundary Award
  6. Davis K., 1951, The Population of India and Pakistan
  7. 10.2307/2137600 · DOI
  8. Hill K., 2005, The partition of India: new demographic estimates of associated population change
  9. 10.1093/jrs/10.1.19 · DOI
  10. Kudaisya G., 2000, The Aftermath of Partition in South Asia
  11. Shahid S, 1993, Disastrous Twilight: A Personal Record of the Partition of India
  12. Sims H., 1988, Political Regimes, Public Policy and Economic Development: Agricultural Performance and Rural Change in the Two Punjabs
  13. Singh A., 2001, The Partition Omnibus
  14. Srivastava R., 2008, An Overview of Migration in India, its Impacts and Key Issues
  15. Vakil C.N., 1950, Economic Consequences of Divided India

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bharadwaj, P., Khwaja, A. I., & Mian, A.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
International Migration
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-05
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
90-106
ISSN
  • 0020-7985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2435
OpenAlex
W1977128801
Cited by
27
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Migration (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › South Asian Studies and Diaspora
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Migration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical Geography
Keywords
population exchange, Partition of India, involuntary migration, literacy, occupational structure, gender composition, religious homogenization, composition effects, agricultural occupations, educational inequality, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review