Cited by 13Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes and associated disorders

Clinical, psychological and demographic factors in a contemporary adult cohort with diabetic ketoacidosis and type 1 diabetes

Hare, Matthew J. L., Deitch, Jessica M., Kang, Matthew J. Y., Bach, Leon A.·2021·Internal Medicine Journal

Abstract

Background Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a potentially life-threatening but often preventable acute complication of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Understanding clinical and psychosocial characteristics of people with DKA, particularly those with multiple presentations, may aid the development of prevention strategies. Aims To describe clinical, psychological and demographic factors in adults with DKA and particularly those factors associated with recurrent admissions. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of all admissions with DKA in people with T1D over a 4-year period from 1 November 2013 to 31 October 2017 at a metropolitan tertiary hospital in Australia. Potential cases were identified by International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision coding data. Data were then manually extracted by clinicians from the electronic medical record. Results There were 154 clinician-adjudicated admissions for DKA among 128 people with T1D. Of these, 16 (13%) had multiple DKA admissions. Forty-one (32%) had a history of depression. The most common factors contributing to presentation included insulin omission (54%), infection (31%), alcohol excess (26%) and new diabetes diagnosis (16%). Compared to people with single admissions, those with recurrent DKA were more likely to smoke (69% vs 27%, P = 0.003), be unemployed (31% vs 11%, P = 0.04) and use illicit substances (44% vs 17%, P = 0.02). Conclusions There is a high prevalence of psychiatric illness, illicit substance use and soci…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/imj.14877

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hare, M. J. L., Deitch, J. M., Kang, M. J. Y., & Bach, L. A.
Affiliations
The Alfred Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Hare, Matthew J. L.
Venue
Internal Medicine Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-08
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
1292-1297
ISSN
  • 1444-0903 (ISSN-L)
  • 1445-5994
OpenAlex
W3023717867
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Internal Medicine Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Academy of Science
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
diabetic ketoacidosis, type 1 diabetes, depression, illicit drug use, smoking, social deprivation, unemployment, insulin omission, sick day management, alcohol excess, infection, psychosocial factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Diabetic Ketoacidosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review