Clinical, psychological and demographic factors in a contemporary adult cohort with diabetic ketoacidosis and type 1 diabetes
Abstract
Background Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a potentially life-threatening but often preventable acute complication of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Understanding clinical and psychosocial characteristics of people with DKA, particularly those with multiple presentations, may aid the development of prevention strategies. Aims To describe clinical, psychological and demographic factors in adults with DKA and particularly those factors associated with recurrent admissions. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of all admissions with DKA in people with T1D over a 4-year period from 1 November 2013 to 31 October 2017 at a metropolitan tertiary hospital in Australia. Potential cases were identified by International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision coding data. Data were then manually extracted by clinicians from the electronic medical record. Results There were 154 clinician-adjudicated admissions for DKA among 128 people with T1D. Of these, 16 (13%) had multiple DKA admissions. Forty-one (32%) had a history of depression. The most common factors contributing to presentation included insulin omission (54%), infection (31%), alcohol excess (26%) and new diabetes diagnosis (16%). Compared to people with single admissions, those with recurrent DKA were more likely to smoke (69% vs 27%, P = 0.003), be unemployed (31% vs 11%, P = 0.04) and use illicit substances (44% vs 17%, P = 0.02). Conclusions There is a high prevalence of psychiatric illness, illicit substance use and soci…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Factors associated with increased risk of DKA that are potentially modifiable include having had one previous episode of DKA, high HbA1c, low self-management skills, psychiatric disorders, infections, somatic comorbidity, alcohol and drug abuse, and less interaction with the health care team.
“These include having had one previous episode of DKA, high HbA 1c , low self-management skills (including omission of insulin therapy), psychiatric disorders, infections, somatic comorbidity, alcohol and drug abuse and less interaction with the health care team (211-213).”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Holt, R. I. G., DeVries, J. H., Hess-Fischl, A., Hirsch, I. B., Kirkman, M. S., Klupa, T., Ludwig, B., Nørgaard, K., Pettus, J., Renard, E., et al. (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci21-0043 · Cited by 699 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hare, M. J. L., Deitch, J. M., Kang, M. J. Y., & Bach, L. A.
- Affiliations
- The Alfred Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hare, Matthew J. L.
- Venue
- Internal Medicine Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1292-1297
- ISSN
- 1444-0903 (ISSN-L)
- 1445-5994
- OpenAlex
- W3023717867
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Internal Medicine Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Academy of Science
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
- Keywords
- diabetic ketoacidosis, type 1 diabetes, depression, illicit drug use, smoking, social deprivation, unemployment, insulin omission, sick day management, alcohol excess, infection, psychosocial factors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Diabetic Ketoacidosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review