Cited by 9Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Prevalence of gestational diabetes in the Waikato region of New Zealand

Open access
Chepulis, Lynne, Morison, Brittany, Lawrenson, Ross, Paul, Ryan·2022·Internal Medicine Journal

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) during pregnancy is associated with health complications for both mother and infant, but patient numbers in the Waikato District Health Board region of New Zealand have not been well characterised. This study reviewed the full 2018 cohort of Waikato District Health Board hospital births (n = 4970) to report on GDM prevalence by ethnicity and age. The overall prevalence of GDM was 5.7% and is more likely to affect Asian, Pacific and Māori women as well as those of advanced maternal age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/imj.15803

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in New Zealand has not been definitively understood, but latest studies assessed it at approximately 6% (5.7-6.2%).

    “The prevalence of GDM in New Zealand has not been definitively understood, or reported according to small studies performed in small catchment areas [23,24,25,26,27], but the latest studies assessed it at approximately 6% (5.7–6.2%).”

    From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Abstract says earlier New Zealand studies estimated GDM prevalence at approximately 6%, generally for particular regions or cohorts. The Discussion reports 5.7% for Waikato births in 2018, not a definitive national estimate. The copy does not support the claimed 5.7–6.2% range: 6.2% is not reported as a GDM prevalence estimate. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Gestational diabetes mellitus in New Zealand more likely affects women at an advanced age, as well as Māori, Pacific, and Asian women.

    “Chepulis et al. presented that GDM more likely affects women at an advanced age, as well as Māori, Pacific, and Asian women [28].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [2]Billionnet C, Mitanchez D, Weill A, Nizard J, Alla F, Hartemann A et al. Gestational diabetes and adverse perinatal outcomes from 716,152 births in France in 2012. Diabetologia 2017; 60: 636– 44. 28197657 PMC6518373
  2. [3]Vääräsmäki MJD. Is it worth treating gestational diabetes: if so, when and how? Diabetologia 2016; 59: 1391– 5. 27168136
  3. [4]Yuen L, Wong VW, Simmons D. Ethnic disparities in gestational diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2018; 18: 1– 2. 30039471
  4. [5]Yapa M, Simmons D. Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in a multiethnic population in New Zealand. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2000; 48: 217– 23. 10802161
  5. [7]Ekeroma AJ, Chandran GS, McCowan L, Ansell D, Eagleton C, Kenealy T. Impact of using the international association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups criteria in South Auckland: prevalence, interventions and outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 55: 34– 41. 25307052
  6. [8]McGrath NM, Baker C, Simkins A. Increased detection of gestational diabetes mellitus by using HbA1c screening in the first antenatal blood tests. Diabet Med 2014; 31: 1277. 24909056
  7. [10]Chepulis LPR, Lewis‐Hills E, Ratnaweera M, McLean N, Wolmarans L, Tamatea J. Ethnic inequities in screening for diabetes in pregnancy in New Zealand – adherence to national guidelines. N Z Med J 2020; 133: 106– 13. 33223553
  8. [11]Wong VW. Gestational diabetes mellitus in five ethnic groups: a comparison of their clinical characteristics. Diabet Med 2012; 29: 366– 71. 21913963
  9. [15]Hedderson M, Ehrlich S, Sridhar S, Darbinian J, Moore S, Ferrara A. Racial/ethnic disparities in the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus by BMI. Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 1492– 8. 22619080 PMC3379591

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chepulis, L., Morison, B., Lawrenson, R., & Paul, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Waikato (NZ)
  • Waikato District Health Board (NZ)
Corresponding author
Chepulis, Lynne
Venue
Internal Medicine Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-06
Volume
52
Issue
6
Pages
1075-1078
ISSN
  • 1444-0903 (ISSN-L)
  • 1445-5994
OpenAlex
W4281713062
Cited by
9
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internal Medicine Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Commons (University of Waikato) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Waikato Medical Research Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, prevalence, ethnicity, Māori women, advanced maternal age, hospital birth
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, New Zealand, Pregnancy, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Diabetes, Gestational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review