The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Humanitarian Politics of European Border Policing: Frontex and Border Police in Evros,
Abstract
This paper explores humanitarianism in the practice of Frontex-assisted Greek border police in Evros and of Frontex at their headquarters in Warsaw. Building on the increase in humanitarian justifications for border policing practices as well as the charges of a lack of humanity, the paper analyzes the relations between humanitarian responses and border policing where humanitarianism is used for framing and giving meaning to institutional and operational practices. In offering an interpretive view of border policing undertaken by people in their working lives across sites and scales, it builds on the critical literature addressing the multifaceted nature of border control in Europe today. At the same time, it speaks to wider debates about the double-sided nature of humanitarian governance concerned with care and control. It argues that while humanitarian motivations have implications for operations in the field and help to frame “good practice” at the policy level, humanitarianism should not be seen as additional or paradoxical to wider border policing operations within forms of governance developed to address the problems of population. Conflict arises in the paradox of protection between the subject of humanitarianism and policing, the population, and the object of border control, the territorially bounded state or regional unit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Migration Apparatus: Security, Labor, and Policymaking in the European Union
Feldman, G. (2011) · doi:10.1515/9780804779128 · Cited by 159
Humanitarianism in Question: Politics, Power, Ethics
(2018) · doi:10.7591/9780801461538 · Cited by 24
Cited by
Seeking refuge in Europe: spaces of transit and the violence of migration management
de Vries, L. A., & Guild, E. (2019) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2018.1468308 · Cited by 153
Humanitarian Rescue/Sovereign Capture and the Policing of Possible Responses to Violent Borders
Pallister‐Wilkins, P. (2017) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12401 · Cited by 129
Self-citation‘Promising victimhood’: contrasting deservingness requirements in refugee resettlement
Welfens, N. (2023) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2022.2117686 · Cited by 99
Disjointed knowledges, obfuscated visibility. Border controls at the French-Italian Alpine border
Tazzioli, M. (2020) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102155 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Pallister-Wilkins, P.
- Venue
- International Political Sociology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-69
- ISSN
- 1749-5679 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088417850
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 65.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.