The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transnational Women's Activism and the Global Diffusion of Gender Quotas
Open accessAbstract
The rapid global spread of quotas for women constitutes one of the most significant political developments of the last thirty years. It transformed the composition of legislatures worldwide. Yet we lack a solid understanding of the forces driving quota diffusion. In this article, we consider how global pressure from the international women's movement affects national gender quota adoption. In the first quantitative analysis of this question on a global scale, we use event history techniques to examine global, transnational, and national influences on quota adoption in 149 countries between 1989 and 2008. Contributing to work on international norm diffusion, we find a crucial role for women's activism, but uncover a negative interaction between increased global pressures and domestic ties to women's transnational organizing. We suggest global pressure to adopt quotas may be weakened by the diverse agendas of women's activist organizations, by perceived threats to male elites posed by women's agitation, or both.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081898550789 · Cited by 8,292
Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses
Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpi014 · Cited by 6,223
Powerful Women: Does Exposure Reduce Bias? *
Beaman, L., Chattopadhyay, R., Duflo, E., Pande, R., & Topalova, P. (2009) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1497 · Cited by 1,060
The Global Right Wing and the Clash of World Politics
Bob, C. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139031042 · Cited by 506
Why Women Protest: Women's Movements in Chile
Baldez, L. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511756283 · Cited by 380
Cited by
Women’s Political Empowerment: A New Global Index, 1900–2012
Sundström, A., Paxton, P., Wang, Y.-T., & Lindberg, S. I. (2017) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.016 · Cited by 292
Self-citationCivil War and Trajectories of Change in Women's Political Representation in Africa, 1985–2010
Hughes, M. M., & Tripp, A. M. (2015) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sov003 · Cited by 197
Self-citationAuthoritarian Institutions and Women’s Rights
Donno, D., & Kreft, A.-K. (2019) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414018797954 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Hughes, M. M., Krook, M. L., & Paxton, P.
- Venue
- International Studies Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-03-12
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 357-372
- ISSN
- 0020-8833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2106983378
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 30.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transnational Women's Activism and the Global Diffusion of Gender Quotas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/isqu.12190
- The paper
- Hughes, M. M., Krook, M. L., & Paxton, P. (2015). Transnational Women's Activism and the Global Diffusion of Gender Quotas. International Studies Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12190
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.