Cited by 17Wound Healing and TreatmentsTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management

The use of acellular porcine dermis, hyaluronic acid and polynucleotides in the treatment of cutaneous ulcers: Single blind randomised clinical trial

Open access
Segreto, Francesco, Carotti, Simone, Marangi, Giovanni Francesco, Francesconi, Maria, Scaramuzzino, Luca, Gratteri, Marco, Caldaria, Erika, Morini, Sergio +1 more·2020·International Wound Journal

Abstract

Reconstruction of chronic ulcers is often hampered by lack of local tissues and poor general conditions. Conservative approaches with debridement and advanced medications, such as polyurethane foam, stand as mainstays. However, the healing process is often slow, thus increasing the risk for infection or other complications. In such cases, porcine dermis (PD) and polynucleotides‐added hyaluronic acid (PAHA) were previously reported to accelerate healing. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of PD, PAHA and polyurethane foam in chronic ulcers. Thirty patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: group 1 was treated with advanced medications, group 2 with PD, group 3 with PAHA. Standardised photographs and biopsies were taken before treatment and at 30‐day follow‐up. Photographs were processed to calculate the wound area. Specimens were stained with Haematoxylin/Eosin, Masson trichrome, and immunohistochemically for CD34, alpha‐Smooth Muscle Actin (α‐SMA), Collagen types I and III, Ki67. The re‐epithelialized area was larger in patients treated with PD and PAHA compared with those treated with polyurethane foam (P < .05 and P < .01, respectively). Specimens from patients treated with PD and PAHA showed a higher number of myofibroblasts (α‐SMA+, P < .01), neo‐angiogenesis (CD34+, P < .01), proliferating dermal cells (Ki67+, P < .01), proliferating keratinocytes (Ki67+, P < .01) and collagen type 1 deposition (P < .05). No difference was found between PD and PAHA. PD and PAHA proved to be more effective than polyurethane foam in the treatment of chronic ulcers. These approaches are a versatile and reliable option to address such cases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/iwj.13454

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The combination of HA and PN was demonstrated to be more effective than HA alone.

    “Segreto et al. reported that the combination of HA and PN was demonstrated to be more effective than HA alone [38].”

    From Comparison of Polynucleotide and Polydeoxyribonucleotide in Dermatology: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [38]

    The passage labeled F I G U R E 3 reports that HA plus polynucleotides was more effective than HA alone, but specifically for re-epithelialization of venous ulcers. The citing sentence omits that outcome and condition, making the finding sound broader than the source states. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Pourmoussa A, Gardner DJ, Johnson MB, Wong AK. An update and review of cell-based wound dressings and their integration into clinical practice. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4 (23):457.
  2. Zhang Z, Lv L, Mamat M, Chen Z, Liu L, Wang Z. Xenogenic (porcine) acellular dermal matrix is useful for the wound healing of severely damaged extremities. Exp Ther Med. 2014;7 (3):621-624.
  3. Zhang Z, Lv L, Mamat M, et al. Xenogenic (porcine) acellular dermal matrix promotes growth of granulation tissues in the wound healing of Fournier gangrene. Am Surg. 2015;81(1): 92-95.
  4. Zajicek R, Mandys V, Mestak O, Sevcik J, Königova R, Matouskova E. Human keratinocyte growth and differentiation on acellular porcine dermal matrix in relation to wound healing potential. Sci World J. 2012;2012:727352.
  5. Voigt J, Driver VR. Hyaluronic acid derivatives and their healing effect on burns, epithelial surgical wounds, and chronic wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Wound Repair Regen. 2012;20(3):317-331.
  6. Aya KL, Stern R. Hyaluronan in wound healing: rediscovering a major player. Wound Repair Regen. 2014;22(5):579-593.
  7. Segreto F, Carotti S, Marangi GF. The role of angiogenesis, inflammation and estrogen receptors in breast implant cap- sules development and remodeling. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71(5):637-643.
  8. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angio- genesis and metastasis--correlation in invasive breast carci- noma. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1):1-1):8.
  9. Chen X, Shi Y, Shu B, et al. The effect of porcine ADM to improve the burn wound healing. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013;6 (11):2280-2291.
  10. De Caridi G, Massara M, Acri I, et al. Trophic effects of polynu- cleotides and hyaluronic acid in the healing of venous ulcers of the lower limbs: a clinical study. Int Wound J. 2016;13(5):754-758.

Authors
Segreto, F., Carotti, S., Marangi, G. F., Francesconi, M., Scaramuzzino, L., Gratteri, M., Caldaria, E., Morini, S., & Persichetti, P.
Affiliations
  • Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT)
  • Federico II University Hospital (IT)
Corresponding author
Segreto, Francesco
Venue
International Wound Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-25
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
1702-1708
ISSN
  • 1742-4801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-481X
OpenAlex
W3043982959
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Wound Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Keywords
chronic cutaneous ulcers, polyurethane foam, wound healing, re-epithelialization, myofibroblasts, neoangiogenesis, collagen deposition, keratinocyte proliferation, advanced wound dressings
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Hyaluronic Acid, Polynucleotides, Polyurethanes, Skin Ulcer, Swine, Single-Blind Method, Acellular Dermis, Heterografts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review