The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Maternity wards or emergency obstetric rooms? Incidence of near‐miss events in African hospitals
Abstract
Background. This study examines near‐miss obstetric events in African hospitals as to the frequency, nature, and ratio of near miss to death and considers whether these could become useful indicators for monitoring the performance of obstetric services in Africa. Methods. Prospective or retrospective reviews of medical records were conducted in nine referral hospitals in three countries (Benin, Côte d'Ivoire, and Morocco). We calculated the incidence of near‐miss obstetric events, near‐miss cases, and maternal deaths related to hemorrhage, hypertensive diseases of pregnancy, dystocia, infections, and anemia and analyzed these according to hospital and timing relative to admission. Results. The incidence of near‐miss cases was varied, and in some hospitals extremely large: from 1% to almost a quarter of all deliveries were near misses. Near‐miss cases were 15 times more common than deaths (ranging from a ratio of 9 : 1–108 : 1). Most of the women with near‐miss events (NMEs) (83%) were already in a critical condition on arrival at the hospital (range 54–90%), and two in three were referred from another facility. The most frequent types of NMEs were hemorrhage and hypertensive diseases of pregnancy, but anemia was the leading cause in three first referral level hospitals in Benin and Côte d'Ivoire. Near‐miss events due to infections were rare. Conclusions. Near‐miss events are extremely common in some African hospitals, with a high proportion arriving in critical conditions. Near‐miss events must be estimated separately for those already in a critical condition on arrival and those developing after admission; the first as a good indicator of the effectiveness of emergency referrals and the second as a potential tool for monitoring the performance of obstetric services.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Van Lerberghe, W., Matthews, Z., Achadi, E., Ancona, C., Campbell, J., Channon, A., de Bernis, L., De Brouwere, V., Fauveau, V., Fogstad, H., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60919-3 · Cited by 248
Filippi, V. (2004) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czh007 · Cited by 116
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Filippi, V., Ronsmans, C., Gohou, V., Goufodji, S., Lardi, M., Sahel, A., Saizonou, J., & De Brouwere, V.
- Venue
- Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-12-16
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-16
- ISSN
- 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0412
- OpenAlex
- W2169508530
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maternity wards or emergency obstetric rooms? Incidence of near‐miss events in African hospitals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00636.x
- The paper
- Filippi, V., Ronsmans, C., Gohou, V., Goufodji, S., Lardi, M., Sahel, A., Saizonou, J., & De Brouwere, V. (2005). Maternity wards or emergency obstetric rooms? Incidence of near‐miss events in African hospitals. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00636.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.