The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marginally Specified Logistic‐Normal Models for Longitudinal Binary Data
Abstract
Summary.Likelihood‐based inference for longitudinal binary data can be obtained using a generalized linear mixed model (Breslow, N. and Clayton, D. G., 1993,Journal of the American Statistical Association88, 9–25; Wolfinger, R. and O'Connell, M., 1993,Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation48, 233–243), given the recent improvements in computational approaches. Alternatively, Fitzmaurice and Laird (1993,Biometrika80, 141–151), Molenberghs and Lesaffre (1994,Journal of the American Statistical Association89, 633–644), and Heagerty and Zeger (1996,Journal of the American Statistical Association91, 1024–1036) have developed a likelihood‐based inference that adopts a marginal mean regression parameter and completes full specification of the joint multivariate distribution through either canonical and/or marginal higher moment assumptions. Each of these marginal approaches is computationally intense and currently limited to small cluster sizes. In this manuscript, an alternative parameterization of the logistic‐normal random effects model is adopted, and both likelihood and estimating equation approaches to parameter estimation are studied. A key feature of the proposed approach is that marginal regression parameters are adopted that still permit individual‐level predictions or contrasts. An example is presented where scientific interest is in both the mean response and the covariance among repeated measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deming, W. E., & Stephan, F. F. (1940) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177731829 · Cited by 1,537
Cited by
Nonlinear models for repeated measurement data: An overview and update
Davidian, M., & Giltinan, D. M. (2003) · Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics · doi:10.1198/1085711032697 · Cited by 419
Ghisletta, P., & Spini, D. (2004) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986029004421 · Cited by 388
Meta-analysis of proportions using generalized linear mixed models.
Lin, L., & Chu, H. (2020) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000001232 · Cited by 345
Misspecified maximum likelihood estimates and generalised linear mixed models
Heagerty, P. J., & Kurland, B. F. (2001) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/88.4.973 · Cited by 294
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Heagerty, P. J.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 688-698
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0420
- OpenAlex
- W2064493774
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marginally Specified Logistic‐Normal Models for Longitudinal Binary Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00688.x
- The paper
- Heagerty, P. J. (1999). Marginally Specified Logistic‐Normal Models for Longitudinal Binary Data. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00688.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.