The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wildlife Population Assessment: Past Developments and Future Directions
Abstract
Summary.We review the major developments in wildlife population assessment in the past century. Three major areas are considered: mark‐recapture, distance sampling, and harvest models. We speculate on how these fields will develop in the next century. Topics for which we expect to see methodological advances include integration of modeling with Geographic Information Systems, automated survey design algorithms, advances in model‐based inference from sample survey data, a common inferential framework for wildlife population assessment methods, improved methods for estimating population trends, the embedding of biological process models into inference, substantially improved models for conservation management, advanced spatiotemporal models of ecosystems, and greater emphasis on incorporating model selection uncertainty into inference. We discuss the kind of developments that might be anticipated in these topics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment
Hilborn, R., & Walters, C. J. (1992) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-3598-0 · Cited by 3,068
On the Dynamics of Exploited Fish Populations
Beverton, R. J. H., & Holt, S. J. (1958) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1440619 · Cited by 2,666
Cited by
Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling
Araújo, M. B., & Guisan, A. (2006) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01584.x · Cited by 1,901
Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time
Yoccoz, N. G., Nichols, J. D., & Boulinier, T. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02205-4 · Cited by 1,432
Large scale wildlife monitoring studies: statistical methods for design and analysis
Pollock, K. H., Nichols, J. D., Simons, T. R., Farnsworth, G. L., Bailey, L. L., & Sauer, J. R. (2002) · Environmetrics · doi:10.1002/env.514 · Cited by 684
Effectiveness in Conservation Practice: Pointers from Medicine and Public Health
Pullin, A. S., & Knight, T. M. (2001) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.99499.x · Cited by 481
Monitoring change in biodiversity through composite indices
Buckland, S. T., Magurran, A. E., Green, R. E., & Fewster, R. M. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1589 · Cited by 403
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Buckland, S. T., Goudie, I. B. J., & Borchers, D. L.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0420
- OpenAlex
- W2008793508
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wildlife Population Assessment: Past Developments and Future Directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00001.x
- The paper
- Buckland, S. T., Goudie, I. B. J., & Borchers, D. L. (2000). Wildlife Population Assessment: Past Developments and Future Directions. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00001.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.