Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 493

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Covariance Estimator for GEE with Improved Small‐Sample Properties

Mancl, Lloyd A., DeRouen, Timothy A.·2001·Biometrics

Abstract

Summary. In this paper, we propose an alternative covariance estimator to the robust covariance estimator of generalized estimating equations (GEE). Hypothesis tests using the robust covariance estimator can have inflated size when the number of independent clusters is small. Resampling methods, such as the jackknife and bootstrap, have been suggested for covariance estimation when the number of clusters is small. A drawback of the resampling methods when the response is binary is that the methods can break down when the number of subjects is small due to zero or near‐zero cell counts caused by resampling. We propose a bias‐corrected covariance estimator that avoids this problem. In a small simulation study, we compare the bias‐corrected covariance estimator to the robust and jackknife covariance estimators for binary responses for situations involving 10–40 subjects with equal and unequal cluster sizes of 16–64 observations. The bias‐corrected covariance estimator gave tests with sizes close to the nominal level even when the number of subjects was 10 and cluster sizes were unequal, whereas the robust and jackknife covariance estimators gave tests with sizes that could be 2–3 times the nominal level. The methods are illustrated using data from a randomized clinical trial on treatment for bone loss in subjects with periodontal disease.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.00126.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. 10.2307/2684460 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/00949659208811388 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960830)15:16<1793::AID-SIM332>3.0.CO;2-2 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/03610919508813280 · DOI
  5. 10.1017/S0266466600004229 · doi:10.1017/s0266466600004229
  6. 10.1093/biomet/73.1.13 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.2307/2533218 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/03610929008830234 · doi:10.1080/03610929008830234
  9. 10.1016/0304-4076(85)90158-7 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Mancl L. A., 1998, Proceedings of the Section on Statistical Education, American Statistical Association, 57
  11. 10.2307/3109770 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1080/03610918808812718 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/biomet/83.3.551 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/03610919408813167 · doi:10.1080/03610919408813167
  15. 10.1080/00949659208811406 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/03610919708813417 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.2307/1912934 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1214/aos/1176350142 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 493

Metadata

Authors
Mancl, L. A., & DeRouen, T. A.
Venue
Biometrics
Published
2001-03
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
126-134
ISSN
  • 0006-341X
  • 1541-0420
Cited by
493
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Covariance Estimator for GEE with Improved Small‐Sample Properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.00126.x
The paper
Mancl, L. A., & DeRouen, T. A. (2001). A Covariance Estimator for GEE with Improved Small‐Sample Properties. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.00126.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.