The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Covariance Estimator for GEE with Improved Small‐Sample Properties
Abstract
Summary. In this paper, we propose an alternative covariance estimator to the robust covariance estimator of generalized estimating equations (GEE). Hypothesis tests using the robust covariance estimator can have inflated size when the number of independent clusters is small. Resampling methods, such as the jackknife and bootstrap, have been suggested for covariance estimation when the number of clusters is small. A drawback of the resampling methods when the response is binary is that the methods can break down when the number of subjects is small due to zero or near‐zero cell counts caused by resampling. We propose a bias‐corrected covariance estimator that avoids this problem. In a small simulation study, we compare the bias‐corrected covariance estimator to the robust and jackknife covariance estimators for binary responses for situations involving 10–40 subjects with equal and unequal cluster sizes of 16–64 observations. The bias‐corrected covariance estimator gave tests with sizes close to the nominal level even when the number of subjects was 10 and cluster sizes were unequal, whereas the robust and jackknife covariance estimators gave tests with sizes that could be 2–3 times the nominal level. The methods are illustrated using data from a randomized clinical trial on treatment for bone loss in subjects with periodontal disease.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, CR3 tends to over-correct the bias of CR0, while the CR1 estimator tends to under-correct.”
From Small-Sample Methods for Cluster-Robust Variance Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Fixed Effects Models (2018) · cites this paper as Mancl and DeRouen 2001
Citations
Cites
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.2307/2684460 · DOI
- 10.1080/00949659208811388 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960830)15:16<1793::AID-SIM332>3.0.CO;2-2 · DOI
- 10.1080/03610919508813280 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0266466600004229 · doi:10.1017/s0266466600004229
- 10.1093/biomet/73.1.13 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2533218 · DOI
- 10.1080/03610929008830234 · doi:10.1080/03610929008830234
- 10.1016/0304-4076(85)90158-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Mancl L. A., 1998, Proceedings of the Section on Statistical Education, American Statistical Association, 57
- 10.2307/3109770 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/03610918808812718 · DOI
- 10.1093/biomet/83.3.551 · DOI
- 10.1080/03610919408813167 · doi:10.1080/03610919408813167
- 10.1080/00949659208811406 · DOI
- 10.1080/03610919708813417 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1912934 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1214/aos/1176350142 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference With Clustered Errors
Cameron, A. C., Gelbach, J. B., & Miller, D. L. (2008) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.90.3.414 · Cited by 4,417
Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments
Murray, D. M., Varnell, S. P., & Blitstein, J. L. (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.3.423 · Cited by 677
Pustejovsky, J. E., & Tipton, E. (2018) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.1080/07350015.2016.1247004 · Cited by 492
Yelland, L. N., Salter, A. B., & Ryan, P. (2011) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwr183 · Cited by 470
Cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: which analyses should be used?
Leyrat, C., Morgan, K. E., Leurent, B., & Kahan, B. C. (2018) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyx169 · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- Mancl, L. A., & DeRouen, T. A.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 126-134
- ISSN
- 0006-341X
- 1541-0420
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Covariance Estimator for GEE with Improved Small‐Sample Properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.00126.x
- The paper
- Mancl, L. A., & DeRouen, T. A. (2001). A Covariance Estimator for GEE with Improved Small‐Sample Properties. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.00126.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.