The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Proposal for Case Definitions and Outcome Measures in Studies of Infantile Spasms and West Syndrome: Consensus Statement of the West Delphi Group
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Purpose: To reach a broad consensus on case definitions, outcomes, and outcome measures that will ease future study design and facilitate comparison of data from different studies of infantile spasms and West syndrome. Methods: Persons who had recently presented or published first‐author original research in this field were invited to participate in an e‐mail Delphi process and to invite other investigators or clinicians who they thought might participate. Results: The process consisted of six rounds, anonymous except to the facilitator. In total, responses were received from 46 participants. The final statement was approved by 31 participants from 15 countries. It concluded that the primary clinical outcome,cessation of spasms, should denote absence of witnessed spasms from within 14 days of commencement of treatment, and for ≥28 consecutive days from the last witnessed spasm.Primary electroclinical outcome denotes cessation of spasms with resolution of hypsarrhythmia.West syndrome should be a defined subset of the syndrome of infantile spasms. An infantile spasms single‐spasm variant should be recognized. Ways are suggested of handling subtle spasms in the context of clinical studies. It proposes a standard for reporting modifying and atypical features of hypsarrhythmia, a minimal set of baseline characteristics and outcomes that should be reported in trials of infantile spasms, and suggests a standard definition of relapse. Consensus was not reached on a definition of hypsarrhythmia. Conclusions: We reached a clear consensus on many aspects of study design for the investigation of infantile spasms, although incomplete consensus was found on how to define EEG criteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cited by
The COMET Handbook: version 1.0
Williamson, P. R., Altman, D. G., Bagley, H., Barnes, K. L., Blazeby, J. M., Brookes, S. T., Clarke, M., Gargon, E., Gorst, S., Harman, N., et al. (2017) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4 · Cited by 2,011
Consensus Statement for Standard of Care in Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Wang, C. H., Finkel, R. S., Bertini, E. S., Schroth, M., Simonds, A., Wong, B., Aloysius, A., Morrison, L., Main, M., Crawford, T. O., et al. (2007) · Journal of Child Neurology · doi:10.1177/0883073807305788 · Cited by 961
Zuberi, S. M., Wirrell, E., Yozawitz, E., Wilmshurst, J. M., Specchio, N., Riney, K., Pressler, R., Auvin, S., Samia, P., Hirsch, E., et al. (2022) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.17239 · Cited by 934
Sinha, I. P., Smyth, R. L., & Williamson, P. R. (2011) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000393 · Cited by 891
Kerr, M. P., Mensah, S., Besag, F., de Toffol, B., Ettinger, A., Kanemoto, K., Kanner, A., Kemp, S., Krishnamoorthy, E., LaFrance Jr, W. C., et al. (2011) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03276.x · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Lux, A. L., & Osborne, J. P.
- Venue
- Epilepsia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-10-27
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1416-1428
- ISSN
- 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-1167
- OpenAlex
- W2084580886
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Proposal for Case Definitions and Outcome Measures in Studies of Infantile Spasms and West Syndrome: Consensus Statement of the West Delphi Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.02404.x
- The paper
- Lux, A. L., & Osborne, J. P. (2004). A Proposal for Case Definitions and Outcome Measures in Studies of Infantile Spasms and West Syndrome: Consensus Statement of the West Delphi Group. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.02404.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.