The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Use of Antiepileptic Drugs—Principles and Practice
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Up to 70% of people developing epilepsy may expect to become seizure free with optimum antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy. The remaining 30% are the most difficult to treat. Most patients are controlled on a single AED, but a small proportion requires a combination of two agents. Add‐on therapy with a second drug, rather than substitution, may be a viable and rational approach in some patients, particularly if the first drug is relatively well tolerated. Precise classification of the type of seizures, as well as the epilepsy syndrome, together with careful recording of both seizures and adverse effects, are essential if rational management decisions are to be made. The goal of therapy should be complete seizure freedom with a single drug taken once or twice a day and without adverse effects. If control is difficult to achieve, the maximum tolerated dose of each drug should be explored, but a balance needs to be struck between adverse effects and control of seizures. In patients in whom treatment appears to be ineffective, the diagnosis of epilepsy and adherence to therapy should be reviewed. Drugs used in combination must be carefully selected, as poor adherence, drug interactions, and toxicity are more likely if more than one drug is prescribed. Agents are usually chosen according to seizure type, patient characteristics, and often by clinician preference. Those that are better tolerated have a low potential for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions, and those that can be easily introduced without any complicated titration schedule have an advantage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early Identification of Refractory Epilepsy
Kwan, P., & Brodie, M. J. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200002033420503 · Cited by 5,204
The impact of epilepsy from the patient's perspective I. Descriptions and subjective perceptions
Fisher, R. S., Vickrey, B. G., Gibson, P., Hermann, B., Penovich, P., Scherer, A., & Walker, S. (2000) · Epilepsy Research · doi:10.1016/s0920-1211(00)00126-1 · Cited by 438
Comprehensive care of the epilepsy patient—control, comorbidity, and cost
W. Bazil, C. (2004) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.455002.x · Cited by 55
Cited by
Epilepsy in poor regions of the world
Newton, C. R., & Garcia, H. H. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61381-6 · Cited by 493
Efficacy and Safety of Oral Lacosamide as Adjunctive Therapy in Adults with Partial‐Onset Seizures
Ben‐Menachem, E., Biton, V., Jatuzis, D., Abou‐Khalil, B., Doty, P., & Rudd, G. D. (2007) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01188.x · Cited by 485
Combination Therapy in Alzheimer???s Disease: A Review of Current Evidence
Schmitt, B., Bernhardt, T., Moeller, H.-J., Heuser, I., & Fr??lich, L. (2004) · CNS Drugs · doi:10.2165/00023210-200418130-00001 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Sander, J. W.
- Venue
- Epilepsia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- s6
- Pages
- 28-34
- ISSN
- 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-1167
- OpenAlex
- W2027759517
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Use of Antiepileptic Drugs—Principles and Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.455005.x
- The paper
- Sander, J. W. (2004). The Use of Antiepileptic Drugs—Principles and Practice. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.455005.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.