Cited by 39Epilepsy research and treatmentPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesDiet and metabolism studies

Clobazam as a new antiepileptic drug and clorazepate dipotassium as an alternative antiepileptic drug in Japan

Open access
Sugai, Kenji·2004·Epilepsia

Abstract

Summary: Purpose: To confirm the efficacy and to clarify the problems of clobazam (CLB) as a new antiepileptic drug (AED) and clorazepate (CLP) as an alternative AED in Japan. Methods: CLB and CLP were added on or replaced with conventional AEDs in 55 and 170 patients with refractory epilepsies, respectively. Short‐term efficacy was studied after at least 2 months of CLB administration and at least 4 weeks of CLP administration. Long‐term efficacy was examined in 31 cases with CLB for ≥6 months and in 86 cases with CLP for ≥6 months. CLB was initiated at 0.15–0.40 mg/kg and increased by 0.1–0.2 mg/kg every 1–2 weeks up to 0.28–1.25 mg/kg. CLP was started at 0.3–0.7 mg/kg and increased by 0.2–0.3 mg/kg every 1–2 weeks up to 2.5 mg/kg. Tolerance was examined in 42 cases with CLB for ≥3 months and 112 cases with CLP for ≥4 weeks. Results: CLB was effective, defined as ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency, in 71% of the short‐term subjects and 81% of the long‐term subjects. Short‐term efficacy was better in symptomatic localization‐related epilepsies, but long‐term efficacy did not differ according to seizure classification. Short‐term efficacy was not different by seizure types or EEG findings. CLP was effective in 70% of the short‐term subjects and 80% of the long‐term subjects. CLP was more effective in patients with localization‐related epilepsies or in patients with partial seizures or focal epileptiform discharges on EEG. Adverse effects developed in 47% of CLB cases and 31% of CLP cases, but the incidence was reduced by lower initial doses and slow dose titration. Tolerance occurred in 24% of CLB cases and 48% of CLP cases, half within 3–4 months after the initiation of CLB and half by 2 months after the start of CLP. Upon rechallenge, 70% of CLB‐tolerant cases and 50% of CLP‐tolerant cases responded to each drug again by increasing or maintaining the dosage. Conclusions: Excellent efficacy of CLB and excellent and prolonged efficacy of CLP for refractory epilepsies were confirmed. Frequent tolerance and adverse effects were major problems, but were manageable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.458005.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study comparing clorazepate and clobazam, tolerance occurred in 48% of patients treated with clorazepate for at least 4 weeks, but in only 24% of patients treated with clobazam for at least 3 months.

    “Tolerance occurred in 48% of patients treated with clorazepate for ‡4 weeks, but in only 24% of patients treated with clobazam for ‡3 months (193).”
  • When dosage was maintained or increased, clorazepate once again became effective in 50% of patients who had previously developed tolerance.

    “However, when the dosage was maintained or increased, clorazepate once again became effective in 50% of patients who had previously developed tolerance.”
  • In 70% of patients who had developed tolerance to clobazam, the drug once again became effective with an increased dosage or at the same dosage.

    “Likewise, in 70% of patients who had developed tolerance to clobazam, the drug once again became effective with an increased dosage or at the same dosage.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 7 · Cited by 39

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Yagi K, Seino M, Takeda A, et al. Open clinical trials of NH-15 (clobazam) in refractory epilepsies: early phase II study and long- term study. Jpn J Neuropsychopharmacol 1995;17:161-73.
  2. Yamatogi Y, Shigematsu H, Oguni K, et al. Phase II clinical trials of NH-15 (clobazam) in refractory epilepsies in children: multicen- ter study. Rinshouiyaku Clin Med Pharmacol 1997;13:2647-64. [in Japanese]
  3. Guggenheim MA, Donaldson J, Hotvedt C. Clinical evaluation of clorazepate. Ann Neurol 1987;22:412-3.
  4. Graf WD, Rothman SJ. Clorazepate therapy in children with refrac- tory seizures. Epilepsia 1987;28:606.
  5. Shorvon SD. Clobazam. In: Levy RH, Mattson RH, Meldrum BS, eds. Antiepileptic drugs, 4th ed. New York: Raven Press, 1995:763- 77.

Authors
Sugai, K.
Affiliations
National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP)
Corresponding author
Sugai, Kenji
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-12
Volume
45
Issue
s8
Pages
20-25
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W2046954212
Cited by
39
References
7
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epilepsia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
Keywords
clobazam, clorazepate dipotassium, antiepileptic drugs, drug-resistant epilepsy, seizure frequency reduction, drug tolerance, adverse drug reactions, dose titration, benzodiazepines, focal epileptiform discharges, focal seizures, drug rechallenge, Japan, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Clobazam, Anticonvulsants, Benzodiazepines, Clorazepate Dipotassium, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Therapy, Combination, Drug Tolerance, Epilepsy, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Japan, Longitudinal Studies, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review