The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EVOLUTION OF EJACULATES: PATTERNS OF PHENOTYPIC AND GENOTYPIC VARIATION AND CONDITION DEPENDENCE IN SPERM COMPETITION TRAITS
Abstract
Sperm competition is widely recognized as a potent force in evolution, influencing male behavior, morphology, and physiology. Recent game theory analyses have examined how sperm competition can influence the evolution of ejaculate expenditure by males and the morphology of sperm contained within ejaculates. Theoretical analyses rest on the assumption that there is sufficient genetic variance in traits important in sperm competition to allow evolving populations to move to the evolutionarily stable equilibrium. Moreover, patterns of genotypic variation can provide valuable insight into the nature of selection currently acting on traits. However, our knowledge of genetic variance underlying traits important in sperm competition is limited. Here we examine patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation in four sperm competition traits in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Testis weight, ejaculate volume, and copula duration were found to have high coefficients of additive genetic variation (CV(A)S), which is characteristic of fitness traits and traits subject to sexual selection. Heritabilities were high, and there was some evidence for Y-linked inheritance in testis weight. In contrast, sperm length had a low CV(A), which is characteristic of traits subject to stabilizing selection. Nevertheless, there was little residual variance so that the heritability of sperm length exceeded 1.0. Such a pattern is consistent with Y-linked inheritance in sperm length. Interestingly, we found that testis weight and sperm length were genetically correlated with heritable male condition. This finding holds important implications for potential indirect benefits associated with the evolution of polyandry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS
PARKER, G. A. (1970) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1970.tb01176.x · Cited by 3,596
Towards a resolution of the lek paradox
Kotiaho, J. S., Simmons, L. W., & Tomkins, J. L. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35070557 · Cited by 301
Self-citationSperm competition experiments between lines of crickets producing different sperm lengths
Morrow, E. H., & Gage, M. J. G. (2001) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1807 · Cited by 61
Cited by
Sexual selection and mate choice
Andersson, M., & Simmons, L. W. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.015 · Cited by 1,258
Self-citationSperm-Female Coevolution in Drosophila
Miller, G. T., & Pitnick, S. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1076968 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Simmons, L. W., & Kotiaho, J. S.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1622-1631
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2137755150
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EVOLUTION OF EJACULATES: PATTERNS OF PHENOTYPIC AND GENOTYPIC VARIATION AND CONDITION DEPENDENCE IN SPERM COMPETITION TRAITS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01474.x
- The paper
- Simmons, L. W., & Kotiaho, J. S. (2002). EVOLUTION OF EJACULATES: PATTERNS OF PHENOTYPIC AND GENOTYPIC VARIATION AND CONDITION DEPENDENCE IN SPERM COMPETITION TRAITS. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01474.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.