The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determining trophic niche width: a novel approach using stable isotope analysis
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Although conceptually robust, it has proven difficult to find practical measures of niche width that are simple to obtain, yet provide an adequate descriptor of the ecological position of the population examined. Trophic niche has proven more tractable than other niche dimensions. However, indices used as a proxy for trophic niche width often suffer from the following difficulties. Such indices rarely lie along a single scale making comparisons between populations or species difficult; have difficulty in combining dietary prey diversity and evenness in an ecologically meaningful way; and fail to integrate diet over ecological time‐scales thus usually only comprise single snapshots of niche width. We propose an alternative novel method for the comparison of trophic niche width: the use of variance of tissue stable isotope ratios, especially those of nitrogen and carbon. This approach is a potentially powerful method of measuring trophic niche width, particularly if combined with conventional approaches, because: it provides a single measure on a continuous axis that is common to all species; it integrates information on only assimilated prey over time; the integration period changes with choice of tissue sampled; and data production is theoretically fast and testing among populations simple. Empirical studies are now required to test the benefits of using isotopic variance as a measure of niche width, and in doing so help refine this approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1957.022.01.039 · Cited by 6,228
Resource partitioning among British and Irish mustelids
McDonald, R. A. (2002) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00588.x · Cited by 154
Cited by
Fanelli, E., Azzurro, E., Bariche, M., Cartes, J. E., & Maynou, F. (2015) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-015-0868-5 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- BEARHOP, S., ADAMS, C. E., WALDRON, S., FULLER, R. A., & MACLEOD, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08-18
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1007-1012
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2656
- OpenAlex
- W2115304230
- Cited by
- 1,413
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determining trophic niche width: a novel approach using stable isotope analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00861.x
- The paper
- BEARHOP, S., ADAMS, C. E., WALDRON, S., FULLER, R. A., & MACLEOD, H. (2004). Determining trophic niche width: a novel approach using stable isotope analysis. Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00861.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.