The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dispersal of adult aquatic insects in catchments of differing land use
Abstract
Summary: There have been widespread changes in land use in the uplands of the UK but the implications for dispersal of adult stages of aquatic invertebrates are poorly known. We estimated the lateral dispersal of adult aquatic insects (Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Ephemeroptera) in seven small, upland streams draining catchments under three categories of land use (coniferous plantation forest, cleared forest, moorland). Malaise traps were set out in transects perpendicular to each stream. More than 29 000 adult insects were taken, distributed among 15 species of stoneflies, 40 species of caddisflies and eight taxa of mayflies. Overall species diversity and equitability were highest in the moorland catchments, and few species were numerous in all catchments. Nearly all the mayflies were taken in the moorland catchments, where caddisflies were also most abundant. Fewest stoneflies were taken in the forested catchments. The vast majority of insects were taken either directly over, or very close to, the stream channel. Half the stoneflies were taken within 18 m of the channel, while 90% had travelled less than 60 m. Caddisflies and mayflies travelled even shorter distances. Although there were differences in lateral dispersal between some catchments, there was no overall effect of land use. The overall sex ratio in stoneflies and mayflies in the riparian zone was close to 1 : 1 and lateral dispersal was similar between the sexes. Male mayflies outnumbered females in the riparian zone and males travelled further from the stream, on average, than females. In catches taken directly over the stream, female stoneflies outnumbered males. Regardless of land use, the flight of mayflies and caddisflies was concentrated along the stream, rather than perpendicular to it. This was also true for two numerous stoneflies (Amphinemura sulcilcollis and Protonemura meyeri) and for female stoneflies overall. Synthesis and applications. The stream corridor, including the riparian strip extending 10–20 m on either side of the channel, is the main habitat for adult aquatic insects, and its management may affect the biodiversity of aquatic communities. The stream corridor is also revealed as the main ‘highway’ for adult dispersal. While there is no evidence from this study of an effect on interstream dispersal of land use elsewhere in the catchment, such an effect cannot yet be refuted because rare long‐distance dispersal events are difficult to record.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure
(1979) · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.2307/4615733 · Cited by 21,526
(2005) · Statistics for Biology and Health · doi:10.1007/0-387-27255-0_9 · Cited by 20,133
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists
Quinn, G. P., & Keough, M. J. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511806384 · Cited by 10,674 · cited 1×
“This procedure provides more power for the individual tests and is recommended in favour of the conventional Bonferroni procedure (Quinn & Keough 2002).”
Generalized Linear Models (2nd ed.).
Therneau, T. M., McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290358 · Cited by 4,907
Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities.
Pickett, S. T. A., Carson, W. P., Begon, M., Harper, J. L., & Townsend, C. R. (1987) · Brittonia · doi:10.2307/2807146 · Cited by 3,157
Proceedings of the Academy of natural sciences of Philadelphia
(1876) · Notes and Queries · doi:10.1093/nq/s5-vi.146.318i · Cited by 3,101
Schuenemeyer, J. H., McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1992) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269238 · Cited by 2,667
Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-0333 · Cited by 2,648
Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure
Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K., & Merriam, G. (1993) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3544927 · Cited by 2,568
Cited by
The role of dispersal in river network metacommunities: Patterns, processes, and pathways
Tonkin, J. D., Altermatt, F., Finn, D. S., Heino, J., Olden, J. D., Pauls, S. U., & Lytle, D. A. (2018) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/fwb.13037 · Cited by 451
Managing riparian buffer strips to optimise ecosystem services: A review
Cole, L. J., Stockan, J., & Helliwell, R. (2020) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2020.106891 · Cited by 348
Mykrä, H., Heino, J., & Muotka, T. (2007) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00272.x · Cited by 287
Community assembly, functional traits, and phylogeny in Himalayan river birds
Sinha, A., Chatterjee, N., Krishnamurthy, R., & Ormerod, S. J. (2022) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.9012 · Cited by 21
“…foraging or by exploiting the subsidy of food resources that reaches the riparian zone by export from the river channel (Buckton & Ormerod, 2008; Petersen et al., 2004); (ii) they occupy habitats created specifically by the fluvial geomorphological system linked to high energy rivers for most…”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- PETERSEN, I., MASTERS, Z., HILDREW, A. G., & ORMEROD, S. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-09-30
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 934-950
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W2167543151
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 9.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dispersal of adult aquatic insects in catchments of differing land use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00942.x
- The paper
- PETERSEN, I., MASTERS, Z., HILDREW, A. G., & ORMEROD, S. J. (2004). Dispersal of adult aquatic insects in catchments of differing land use. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00942.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.