Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 563

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tree species distributions and local habitat variation in the Amazon: large forest plot in eastern Ecuador

Valencia, Renato, Foster, Robin B., Villa, Gorky, Condit, Richard, Svenning, Jens‐Christian, Hernández, Consuelo, Romoleroux, Katya, Losos, Elizabeth, Magård, Else, Balslev, Henrik·2004·Journal of Ecology

Abstract

Summary: 1 We mapped and identified all trees ≥ 10 mm in diameter in 25 ha of lowland wet forest in Amazonian Ecuador, and found 1104 morphospecies among 152 353 individuals. The largest number of species was mid‐sized canopy trees with maximum height 10–20 m and understorey treelets with maximum height of 5–10 m. 2 Several species of understorey treelets in the genera Matisia and Rinorea dominated the forest numerically, while important canopy species were Iriartea deltoidea and Eschweilera coriacea. 3 We examined how species partition local topographic variation into niches, and how much this partitioning contributes to forest diversity. Evidence in favour of topographic niche‐partitioning was found: similarity in species composition between ridge and valley quadrats was lower than similarity between two valley (or two ridge) quadrats, and 25% of the species had large abundance differences between valley and ridge‐top. On the other hand, 25% of the species were generalists, with similar abundance on both valley and ridges, and half the species had only moderate abundance differences between valley and ridge. 4 Topographic niche‐partitioning was not finely grained. There were no more than three distinct vegetation zones: valley, mid‐slope, and upper‐ridge, and the latter two differed only slightly in species composition. 5 Similarity in species composition declined with distance even within a topographic habitat, to about the same degree as it declined between habitats. This suggests patchiness not related to topographic variation, and possibly due to dispersal limitation. 6 We conclude that partitioning of topographic niches does make a contribution to the α‐diversity of Amazonian trees, but only a minor one. It provides no explanation for the co‐occurrence of hundreds of topographic generalists, nor for the hundreds of species with similar life‐form appearing on a single ridge‐top.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00876.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 563

Metadata

Authors
Valencia, R., Foster, R. B., Villa, G., Condit, R., Svenning, J., Hernández, C., Romoleroux, K., Losos, E., Magård, E., & Balslev, H.
Venue
Journal of Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03-23
Volume
92
Issue
2
Pages
214-229
ISSN
  • 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2745
OpenAlex
W2134862042
Cited by
563
References
0
FWCI
15.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tree species distributions and local habitat variation in the Amazon: large forest plot in eastern Ecuador. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00876.x
The paper
Valencia, R., Foster, R. B., Villa, G., Condit, R., Svenning, J., Hernández, C., Romoleroux, K., Losos, E., Magård, E., & Balslev, H. (2004). Tree species distributions and local habitat variation in the Amazon: large forest plot in eastern Ecuador. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00876.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.