Cited by 111Fish Ecology and Management StudiesFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes

Principles for linking fish habitat to fisheries management and conservation

Naiman, R. J., Latterell, J. J.·2005·Journal of Fish Biology

Abstract

A set of eight simple ecological and social principles is proposed that could enhance the understanding of what constitutes fish ‘habitat’ and, if implemented, could contribute to improved management and conservation strategies. The habitat principles are a small, interrelated sub‐set that may be coupled with additional ones to formulate comprehensive guidelines for management and conservation strategies. It is proposed that: 1) habitat can be created by keystone species and interactions among species; 2) the productivity of aquatic and riparian habitat is interlinked by reciprocal exchanges of material; 3) the riparian zone is fish habitat; 4) fishless headwater streams are inseparable from fish‐bearing rivers downstream; 5) habitats can be coupled – in rivers, lakes, estuaries and oceans, and in time; 6) habitats change over hours to centuries; 7) fish production is dynamic due to biocomplexity, in species and in habitats; 8) management and conservation strategies must evolve in response to present conditions, but especially to the anticipated future. It is contended that the long‐term resilience of native fish communities in catchments shared by humans depends on incorporating these principles into management and conservation strategies. Further, traditional strategies poorly reflect the dynamic nature of habitat, the true extent of habitat, or the intrinsic complexity in societal perspectives. Forward‐thinking fish management and conservation plans view habitat as more th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0022-1112.2005.00921.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naiman, R. J., & Latterell, J. J.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Naiman, R. J.
Venue
Journal of Fish Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-11-24
Volume
67
Issue
sB
Pages
166-185
ISSN
  • 0022-1112 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8649
OpenAlex
W2081214257
Cited by
111
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Fish Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Keywords
fish habitat, fisheries management, fish conservation, keystone species, species interactions, riparian zones, headwater streams, catchment connectivity, habitat change, native fish communities, ecosystem resilience, anthropogenic habitat change, ecoregions, watershed management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review