Cited by 6Immunotherapy and Immune ResponsesT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization

UVB-irradiated dendritic cells fail to tolerize murine CD8 naive or effector T cells

Open access
Dudda, Jan C., Denfeld, Ralf W., Simon, Jan C., Martin, Stefan F.·2004·Journal of Investigative Dermatology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0022-202x.2004.22423.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Langerhans cells, after escaping from UV-induced apoptosis, have a decreased capacity to prime naive CD8+ T cells, inducing immunological tolerance.

    “In addition, LCs, after escaping from UV-induced apoptosis, have a decreased capacity to prime naive CD8+ T cells, inducing immunological tolerance [70].”

    From Molecular Mechanisms of UV-Induced Apoptosis and Its Effects on Skin Residential Cells: The Implication in UV-Based Phototherapy (2013) · cites this paper as [70]

    The Abstract and Discussion report reduced priming of naïve CD8+ T cells by UVB-irradiated bone marrow-derived dendritic cells, not specifically Langerhans cells. Crucially, the Discussion says those cells do not induce direct tolerance in naïve or effector CD8+ T cells—the opposite of the cited claim's tolerance conclusion. The cited passages also do not establish that the cells had escaped UV-induced apoptosis. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dudda, J. C., Denfeld, R. W., Simon, J. C., & Martin, S. F.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Martin, Stefan F.
Venue
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
122
Issue
4
Pages
945-952
ISSN
0022-202X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983288742
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01GC0001)
  • Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Keywords
UVB irradiation, dendritic cells, T cell tolerance, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, trinitrophenyl, viral peptides, T cell-mediated disease, antigen-presenting cells, allergic contact dermatitis, autoimmune disease, T cell priming
MeSH terms
Animals, Epitopes, Cells, Cultured, Dendritic Cells, Immune Tolerance, Ligands, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, Trinitrobenzenes, Ultraviolet Rays, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Adoptive Transfer, T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review