The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PHOSPHATE AND SILICATE GROWTH AND UPTAKE KINETICS OF THE DIATOMS ASTERIONELLA FORMOSA AND CYCLOTELLA MENEGHINIANA IN BATCH AND SEMICONTINUOUS CULTURE1
Abstract
SUMMARY Information on the nutrient kinetics of Asterionella formosa Hass. and Cyclotella meneghiniana Kutz. under either phosphate or silicate limitation was obtained for use in a Monod model and in a variable internal stores model of growth. Short‐term batch culture growth experiments were fit to the Monod model and long‐term semicontinuous culture experiments and short‐term uptake experiments were fit to the variable internal stores model. Mathematical analysis indicates that the parameters of the 2 models may be expressed in terms of each other at steady state. The qualitative results of both batch and steady state culture methods agree. For limiting phosphate experiments. A. formosa is better able to grow at low PO4‐P concentrations than C. meneghiniana, as shown by its lower K for PO4‐P limited growth. The kQ of A. formosa compared to C. meneghiniana found in long‐term semicontinuous culture indicates that A. formosa is almost an order of magnitude more efficient at using internal phosphate for growth. The qualitative results under silicate‐limited growth of C. meneghiniana is less than that of A. formosa. The kQ from semicontinuous culture experiments indicates that C. meneghiniana is the more efficient at using internal silicate for growth. Nutrient uptake experiments showed more variability from a Michaelis‐Menten relationship than short‐term growth experiments. There were no significant differences between the 2 species in half saturation constants for either phosphate or silicate uptake. We observed a marked dependence of the coefficient of luxury consumption (R) of phosphate on the steady state growth rate. A. formosa has a higher R than C. meneghiniana.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Resource Competition between Plankton Algae: An Experimental and Theoretical Approach
Tilman, D. (1977) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1935608 · Cited by 1,253
Self-citationPhytoplankton Community Ecology: The Role of Limiting Nutrients
Tilman, D., Kilham, S. S., & Kilham, P. (1982) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.13.110182.002025 · Cited by 1,085
Self-citationStructure and Functional Properties of Ulvan, a Polysaccharide from Green Seaweeds
Lahaye, M., & Robic, A. (2007) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm061185q · Cited by 1,019
Grover, J. P. (1991) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285254 · Cited by 271
STABLE COEXISTENCE IN A FLUCTUATING ENVIRONMENT: AN EXPERIMENTAL DEMONSTRATION
Descamps-Julien, B., & Gonzalez, A. (2005) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/04-1700 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Tilman, D., & Kilham, S. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Phycology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1976-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 375-383
- ISSN
- 0022-3646 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-8817
- OpenAlex
- W2067877098
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PHOSPHATE AND SILICATE GROWTH AND UPTAKE KINETICS OF THE DIATOMS ASTERIONELLA FORMOSA AND CYCLOTELLA MENEGHINIANA IN BATCH AND SEMICONTINUOUS CULTURE1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1976.00375.x
- The paper
- Tilman, D., & Kilham, S. S. (1976). PHOSPHATE AND SILICATE GROWTH AND UPTAKE KINETICS OF THE DIATOMS ASTERIONELLA FORMOSA AND CYCLOTELLA MENEGHINIANA IN BATCH AND SEMICONTINUOUS CULTURE1. Journal of Phycology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1976.00375.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.