The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CELL SURVIVAL CHARACTERISTICS AND MOLECULAR RESPONSES OF ANTARCTIC PHYTOPLANKTON TO ULTRAVIOLET‐B RADIATION1
Abstract
Twelve species of Antarctic diatoms were studied to assess UV sensitivity in relation to cellular and molecular aspects of DNA damage and repair. Responses of cell survival, induction of DNA damage, and DNA repair capacity were determined. There was a wide range of interspecific UV‐sensitivity among diatoms. D 37 values (average fluence to kill one cell) ranged from 681 J · m−2 (most sensitive) to 25,338 J · m−2 (most resistant). Molecular analysis (by radioimmunoassay) of UV‐induced DNA damage [induction of cys‐syn cyclobutane dimers and pyrimidine (6‐4) pyrimidone photoproducts] also revealed considerable variability among species [0.98–84 lesions · (10 8 daltons DNA)−1 induced by exposure to 2500 J · m−2]. Repair of DNA damage ranged from 0.18 to 2.72 lesions removed · (10 8 daltons DNA)−1 in 6 h; removal represented 0.72–73.5% of initial damage. Comparison of cellular responses associated with photoenhanced repair and nucleotide excision (“dark”) repair indicated that light‐mediated correction of UV damage was an important factor in cell survival. There was a relationship between the number of photoproducts induced and cell survival, but not between repair efficiency and survival. The data also indicate a general dependence of photoproduct induction and D 37 values on cell size and shape (expressed as the surface area: volume ratio which ranged from 0.07 to 0.66 between species) and suggest that these factors are indicators of UV sensitivity. Smaller cells with greater surface area: volume ratios sustained more damage per unit of DNA, had lower D 37 values, and were more sensitive to UV exposure. The wide species variations observed in molecular and cellular responses to UV exposure emphasize the ecological implications of changes in natural UV regimes. These changes can act as determinants of cell size and taxonomic structure within phytoplankton communities and have as yet unknown effects on trophic interactions within the Antarctic ecosystem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dunlap, W. C., Chalker, B. E., & Oliver, J. K. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/0022-0981(86)90108-5 · Cited by 190
Cited by
Hill, W. (1996) · Algal Ecology · doi:10.1016/b978-012668450-6/50034-5 · Cited by 420
Solar ultraviolet-B radiation and aquatic primary production: damage, protection, and recovery
Vincent, W. F., & Roy, S. (1993) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a93-001 · Cited by 406
Ultraviolet-absorbing/screening substances in cyanobacteria, phytoplankton and macroalgae
Sinha, R. P., Klisch, M., Gröniger, A., & Häder, D.-P. (1998) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology · doi:10.1016/s1011-1344(98)00198-5 · Cited by 259
Beardall, J., Sobrino, C., & Stojkovic, S. (2009) · Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences · doi:10.1039/b9pp00034h · Cited by 108
Karsten, U., Lembcke, S., & Schumann, R. (2007) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-006-0406-x · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Karentz, D., Cleaver, J. E., & Mitchell, D. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Phycology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 326-341
- ISSN
- 0022-3646 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-8817
- OpenAlex
- W1995036048
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CELL SURVIVAL CHARACTERISTICS AND MOLECULAR RESPONSES OF ANTARCTIC PHYTOPLANKTON TO ULTRAVIOLET‐B RADIATION1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1991.00326.x
- The paper
- Karentz, D., Cleaver, J. E., & Mitchell, D. L. (1991). CELL SURVIVAL CHARACTERISTICS AND MOLECULAR RESPONSES OF ANTARCTIC PHYTOPLANKTON TO ULTRAVIOLET‐B RADIATION1. Journal of Phycology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1991.00326.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.